The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence and characteristics of noncompliant behaviour and its risk factors in kidney transplant recipients
Open accessAbstract
Noncompliance with therapy is one possible explanation for the observation that long-term graft survival is not sufficiently improved by the development in immunosuppression. The aim of the study was to explore the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of noncompliance with immunosuppression. A total of 161 adult kidney transplant recipients were interviewed about their self-rated health, social support, education, stress from adverse effects and compliance with the immunosuppression. The prevalence of subclinical noncompliance was 54%. Noncompliant patients declared significantly worse self-rated health, less satisfaction with social support and higher stress from adverse effects. Male gender (OR 7.5, CI 2.4-23.39), high stress from adverse effects (OR 12.27, CI 2.44-61.88), fair self-rated health (OR 4.45, CI 1.04-19.55) and fair satisfaction with social support (OR 4.55, CI 1.08-19.24) were predictors of noncompliance. Standardized detection methods should be developed with the aim of identifying patients who are at risk of noncompliance in order to prevent graft loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space
Petrides, K. V., Pita, R., & Kokkinaki, F. (2007) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712606x120618 · Cited by 1,387
Weekly work engagement and performance: a study among starting teachers.
Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x402596 · Cited by 1,249
Experiential avoidance as a functional dimensional approach to psychopathology: An empirical review
Chawla, N., & Ostafin, B. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20400 · Cited by 805
On the Nature of Emotion Regulation
Campos, J. J., Frankel, C. B., & Camras, L. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00681.x · Cited by 749
Guilt appeals: persuasion knowledge and charitable giving
Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20181 · Cited by 300
Value‐driven Internet shopping: The mental accounting theory perspective
Gupta, S., & Kim, H. (2010) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20317 · Cited by 278
Denhaerynck, K., Steiger, J., Bock, A., Schäfer-Keller, P., Köfer, S., Thannberger, N., & De Geest, S. (2007) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01611.x · Cited by 184
Ladin, K., Daniels, A., Osani, M., & Bannuru, R. R. (2018) · Transplantation Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.trre.2017.04.001 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenberger, J., Geckova, A. M., Dijk, J. P., Nagyova, I., Roland, R., Heuvel, W. J. A., & Groothoff, J. W.
- Venue
- Transplant International
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1072-1078
- ISSN
- 0934-0874 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2277
- OpenAlex
- W2167761867
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
