Cited by 9Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesMedical and Biological SciencesVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Anatomy of the Kidneys of a Newly Born Pigmy Hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis Morton)

Maluf, N. S. R.·1978·Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia

Abstract

This is probably the first description of the renal anatomy of the pigmy hippopotamus. The observations were made with dissecting and transmitted light microscopes. Nephrons were micro‐dissected from macerated portions of the kidney. The apex of the renal loops is always at the wide helicoidal portion of the nephron and occurs in all zones but especially in the outer zone of the medulla. The kidney is the branched tubus maximus type, similar to that of the Nile hippopotamus. Distinguishing features are indicated and discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0264.1978.tb00492.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each kidney of C. liberiensis is supplied with cranial and caudal renal arteries that branch into several perforating arteries, which in turn supply their respective lobes.

    “Each kidney is supplied with cranial and caudal renal arteries that branch into several perforating arteries, which in turn supply their respective lobes (Maluf 1978;1994).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Maluf 1978

  • The large number of short nephrons in C. liberiensis is believed to have allowed the evolution of a bigger animal, albeit with a limited ability to produce concentrated urine.

    “The large number of short nephrons is believed to have allowed the evolution of a bigger animal, albeit with a limited ability to produce concentrated urine (Maluf 1978(Maluf , 1994)).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Maluf 1978

  • Instead of infundibula and renculi, the lobes of C. liberiensis kidneys are projections like the fingers of a hand; each kidney has 17-25 lobes.

    “Instead, the lobes are projections like the fingers of a hand; each kidney has 17-25 lobes (Maluf 1978(Maluf , 1994)).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Maluf 1978

  • Each kidney of C. liberiensis has about three times 10^6 glomeruli; however, the total length of the tubule, including the Loop of Henle, is only 6.8 mm.

    “Each kidney has about three times 10 6 glomeruli (Maluf 1994); however, the total length of the tubule, including the Loop of Henle, is only 6.8 mm (Maluf 1978).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Maluf 1978

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maluf, N. S. R.
Affiliations
Huron Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Maluf, N. S. R.
Venue
Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
28-48
ISSN
  • 0300-8649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-2096
  • 1439-0264
OpenAlex
W2056197568
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anatomia Histologia Embryologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
Choeropsis liberiensis, renal anatomy, kidney, nephron, renal medulla
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Artiodactyla, Kidney, Organ Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review