Cited by 105Animal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Beiträge zur Biologie der Haus- und der Ährenmaus nebst einigen Beobachtungen an anderen Nagern

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus·2010·Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1950.tb01638.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are some reports about mice living in nature peacefully in big family groups, but they are much less common.

    “It should be mentioned that there are some reports about mice living in nature peacefully in big family groups; however, they are much less common 85 (cited by References 68,76,86).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-26
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
558-587
ISSN
0044-3573 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008057714
Cited by
105
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
house mouse, Mus musculus, field mouse, rodent biology, rodent behavior, comparative animal behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review