Cited by 22Animal Behavior and ReproductionFish biology, ecology, and behaviorIchthyology and Marine Biology

Shoals Receive more Attacks from the Wolf‐Fish (Hoplias malabaricus Bloch, 1794)

Botham, Marc S., Krause, Jens·2005·Ethology

Abstract

We investigated whether the piscivorous wolf‐fish,Hoplias malabaricus(Bloch, 1794), showed preferences for attacking a ‘straggler’ or a shoal using guppies,Poecilia reticulata(Peters, 1860), as prey. Predators should show a preference to attack single prey items rather than grouped prey to overcome the confusion effect, which has been shown to negatively affect their capture success. However, they may attack groups more frequently because they are more likely to detect them because of their greater conspicuousness. In our study we looked at predator choice for grouped or single prey and whether this was affected by larger shoals being more conspicuous. We offeredHopliasbinary choices of a single guppy (straggler) and shoals of 2, 6 and 10 fish.Hopliaspreferred to attack the shoal over the straggler with regards to both frequency of attacks (initial and subsequent) and attack duration. The implications for predator–prey interactions of such a preference are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01122.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predators may preferentially attack large schools if school size increases the conspicuousness and detectability of prey.

    “Predators may preferentially attack large schools if school size increases the conspicuousness and detectability of prey (Botham & Krause 2005), and not all predators succumb equally to the confusion effect attributed to schools (Turesson & Brönmark 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Botham, M. S., & Krause, J.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Botham, Marc S.
Venue
Ethology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-16
Volume
111
Issue
10
Pages
881-890
ISSN
  • 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0310
OpenAlex
W1992178268
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethology (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Leeds
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
Hoplias malabaricus, Poecilia reticulata, predator-prey interactions, shoal size, confusion effect, attack behavior, piscivores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review