The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Olfactory response of a predatory mirid to herbivore induced plant volatiles: multiple herbivory vs. single herbivory
Abstract
Plants infested with a single herbivore species can attract natural enemies through the emission of herbivore‐induced plant volatiles (HIPVs). However, under natural conditions plants are often attacked by more than one herbivore species. We investigated the olfactory response of a generalist predators Macrolophus caliginosus to pepper infested with two‐spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae, or green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, vs. plants infested with both herbivore species in a Y‐tube olfactometer set up. In addition, the constituents of volatile blends from plants exposed to multiple or single herbivory were identified by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). The mirid bugs showed a stronger response to volatiles emitted from plants simultaneously infested with spider mites and aphids than to those emitted from plants infested by just one herbivore, irrespective of the species. Combined with results from previous studies under similar conditions we infer that this was a reaction to herbivore induced plant volatiles. The GC‐MS analysis showed that single herbivory induced the release of 22 additional compounds as compared with the volatiles emitted from clean plants. Quantitative analyses revealed that the amount of volatile blends emitted from pepper infested by both herbivores was significantly higher than that from pepper infested by a single herbivore. Moreover, two unique substances were tentatively identified (with a probability of 94% and 91%, respectively) in volatiles emitted by multiple herbivory damaged plants: α‐zingiberene and dodecyl acetate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moringa oleifera : a food plant with multiple medicinal uses
Anwar, F., Latif, S., Ashraf, M., & Gilani, A. H. (2007) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.2023 · Cited by 1,657
Katz, E., Nisani, S., Yadav, B. S., Woldemariam, M. G., Shai, B., Obolski, U., Ehrlich, M., Shani, E., Jander, G., & Chamovitz, D. A. (2015) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12824 · Cited by 118
Effect of benzyl isothiocyanate on tomato fruit infection development by Alternaria alternata
Troncoso‐Rojas, R., Sánchez‐Estrada, A., Ruelas, C., García, H. S., & Tiznado‐Hernández, M. (2005) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2129 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Moayeri, H. R. S., Ashouri, A., Poll, L., & Enkegaard, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 326-332
- ISSN
- 0931-2048 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0418
- OpenAlex
- W2016861167
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Olfactory response of a predatory mirid to herbivore induced plant volatiles: multiple herbivory vs. single herbivory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01177.x
- The paper
- Moayeri, H. R. S., Ashouri, A., Poll, L., & Enkegaard, A. (2007). Olfactory response of a predatory mirid to herbivore induced plant volatiles: multiple herbivory vs. single herbivory. Journal of Applied Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01177.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.