Cited by 17Fish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine BiologyMarine and fisheries research

Assessing the risk of entrainment by cutterhead dredges to juvenile lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) and juvenile pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus): Risk of entrainment by cutterhead dredges to A. fulvescens and S. albus

Hoover, J. J., Boysen, K. A., Beard, J. A., Smith, H.·2011·Journal of Applied Ichthyology

Abstract

Sturgeon are threatened by dredging, but there is no established protocol for determining risk of entrainment to different populations of wide-ranging species. We demonstrate that laboratory evaluations of swimming performance for individual populations are an effective way to describe susceptibility of entrainment. Using a Blazka-type swim tunnel, we quantified positive rheotaxis (head-first orientation into flowing water), endurance (time to fatigue), and behaviour (method of movement) of juvenile sturgeon in water velocities ranging from 10 to 90 cm s−1. Sturgeon representing four different populations of the United States were tested: two populations of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) and two populations of pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus). Lake sturgeon from Lake Winnebago were weaker swimmers than those from the Wisconsin River, and pallid sturgeon from the Yellowstone River were weaker swimmers than those from the Atchafalaya River. Rheotaxis, endurance, and behavioural data were used to calculate an index of entrainment risk, ranging from 0 (unlikely) to 1.00 (inevitable), which was applied to hydraulic models of dredge flow fields. Risk of entrainment varied among populations but for all groups tested, substantial entrainment risk occurred only within a 1.25 m radius of the draghead and this risk could be significantly reduced or eliminated by reducing the diameter of the dredge pipe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01746.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoover, J. J., Boysen, K. A., Beard, J. A., & Smith, H.
Affiliations
United States Army (US)
Corresponding author
Hoover, J. J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ichthyology
Published
2011-03-28
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
369-375
ISSN
0175-8659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1870341847
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Ichthyology (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, pallid sturgeon, Scaphirhynchus albus, juvenile sturgeon, swimming performance, rheotaxis, endurance, hydraulic modeling, population differences, Lake Winnebago, Wisconsin River, Yellowstone River, Atchafalaya River

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review