The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional Differences in the Growth Hormone and Insulin‐like Growth Factor Axis in Cattle and Pigs: Implications for Post‐partum Nutrition and Reproduction
Abstract
Contents: Growth hormone (GH) and insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I) control growth and lactation in cattle and swine. Insulin participates in the endocrinology of growth and lactation because insulin and GH are antagonistic in their actions. Dairy cows experience a period of negative energy balance during the first 4–8 weeks post‐partum. During this period, their somatotropic axis (comprised of GH, the GH receptor and IGF‐I) becomes uncoupled and there is elevated GH and diminished IGF‐I in the circulation. Blood insulin concentrations are low as well. Sows are different from dairy cows because their somatotropic axis remains coupled during lactation and both GH and IGF‐I are elevated. Nonetheless, sows that become catabolic during lactation will have reduced IGF‐I concentrations. Sows are inseminated after weaning so their metabolic state is different from post‐partum beef and dairy cows that are inseminated when they are lactating. Dairy cows are fed ad libitum and naturally have low IGF‐I during lactation. Sows have elevated IGF‐I when they are well‐fed. A threshold of IGF‐I protein in follicular fluid may be met by local ovarian (paracrine/autocrine) and endocrine sources of IGF‐I. Nutritionally induced changes in insulin and in liver IGF‐I secretion that arise from perturbations of the somatotropic axis have a direct effect on the ovary through the endocrine actions of insulin and IGF‐I. Sows and cows that are nutritionally compromised have low concentrations of insulin and IGF‐I in their blood and this theoretically reduces ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins. Although sows are inseminated after weaning, there appear to be carry‐over effects of the previous lactation on the ovarian follicular populations that develop after the sow is weaned. Understanding the mechanisms through which metabolic hormones control ovarian function may lead to improved reproductive management of both pigs and cattle because lactation and post‐partum reproduction are closely tied in both species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regulation of folliculogenesis and the determination of ovulation rate in ruminants
Scaramuzzi, R. J., Baird, D. T., Campbell, B. K., Driancourt, M.-A., Dupont, J., Fortune, J. E., Gilchrist, R. B., Martin, G. B., McNatty, K. P., McNeilly, A. S., et al. (2011) · Reproduction, Fertility and Development · doi:10.1071/rd09161 · Cited by 310
Lucy, M. C., & Safranski, T. J. (2017) · Molecular Reproduction and Development · doi:10.1002/mrd.22844 · Cited by 115
Self-citationLu, X., Arbab, A. A. I., Zhang, Z., Fan, Y., Han, Z., Gao, Q., Sun, Y., & Yang, Z. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10081271 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucy, M.
- Venue
- Reproduction in Domestic Animals
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- s2
- Pages
- 31-39
- ISSN
- 0044-5371 (ISSN-L)
- 0936-6768
- 1439-0531
- OpenAlex
- W2018204863
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Differences in the Growth Hormone and Insulin‐like Growth Factor Axis in Cattle and Pigs: Implications for Post‐partum Nutrition and Reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01140.x
- The paper
- Lucy, M. (2008). Functional Differences in the Growth Hormone and Insulin‐like Growth Factor Axis in Cattle and Pigs: Implications for Post‐partum Nutrition and Reproduction. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01140.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.