Cited by 29Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesGlobal Health Workforce Issues

Far West Area Health Service Mental Health Integration Project: Model for rural Australia?

Perkins, David A., Roberts, Russell, Sanders, Tuana, Rosen, Alan·2006·Australian Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

Objective: To see if a new model of service delivery ensures that individuals with a mental illness in rural and remote settings could be assessed, treated and cared for in a more appropriate way. Design: Community mental health teams (CMHTs), general practitioners (GP) and other agencies were provided with clinical and broader support services by consultant psychiatrists from public and private sectors. The occasions of service were logged, audited and relevant provider groups were interviewed. Ethics approval was provided by Human Research Ethics Community of University of New South Wales. Setting: Far West Area Health Service (FWAHS), remote New South Wales. Participants: An enhanced service was provided for residents, specialist mental health and other healthcare providers. Results: Regular access to psychiatrists for primary and secondary care was achieved in remote communities in FWAHS. 3908 new patients were seen by CMHTs between July 2002 and December 2003 and 380 by visiting psychiatrists between January 2002 and July 2003. Secondary consultation, mentoring and education opportunities were made available by tele‐conference and face‐to‐face for CMHTs and others in FWAHS. GPs and CMHTs in remote settings were satisfied with improved access to psychiatrist care. Conclusions: This model appears to be sustainable with reasonable levels of funding in FWAHS and may be applicable to other remote contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2006.00777.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkins, D. A., Roberts, R., Sanders, T., & Rosen, A.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Perkins, David A.
Venue
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05-17
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
105-110
ISSN
  • 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1584
OpenAlex
W2061298288
Cited by
29
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
mental health integration, community mental health teams, rural mental health, remote communities, general practitioners, New South Wales, service delivery models
MeSH terms
Community Mental Health Services, Community-Institutional Relations, Cooperative Behavior, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, New South Wales, Patient Care Team, Program Evaluation, Models, Organizational, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review