Cited by 90Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentClinical practice guidelines implementationTreatment of Major Depression

Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines Team for Bipolar Disorder·2004·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists is co-ordinating the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in psychiatry, funded under the National Mental Health Strategy (Australia) and the New Zealand Health Funding Authority METHOD: For these guidelines, the CPG team reviewed the treatment outcome literature (including meta-analyses) and consulted with practitioners and consumers. TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of bipolar disorder by phase of illness, that is acute mania, mixed episodes and bipolar depression, and the prophylaxis of such episodes. It specifies the roles of various mood-stabilizing medications and of psychological treatments such as cognitive therapy and psycho-education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01356.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most recent Australian guidelines for management of bipolar disorder make no mention of potential therapeutic benefits of exercise.

    “the most recent Australian guidelines for the management of bipolar disorder (Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines Team for Bipolar Disorder 2004) make no mention of the potential therapeutic bene fi ts of exercise.”

    From A call to action: Exercise as treatment for patients with mental illness (2015) · cites this paper as Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines Team for Bipolar Disorder 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines Team for Bipolar Disorder
Corresponding author
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines Team for Bipolar Disorder
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-05
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
280-305
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W4205748692
Cited by
90
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
bipolar disorder, treatment guidelines, bipolar disorder management
MeSH terms
Anticonvulsants, Australia, Bipolar Disorder, Combined Modality Therapy, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Humans, Mental Health Services, New Zealand, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Antipsychotic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Drug Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review