The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT)
Abstract
The purpose of tumour staging for colorectal cancer (CRC) is to help define clinical management, facilitate communication between physicians, provide a basis for stratification and analysis of treatment results in prospective studies, and provide some prognostic information for patients and their families. The World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, and Coloproctology, Working Party on staging for CRC studied six commonly used systems to review their strengths and weaknesses. Although it was concluded that defining a new staging system was unnecessary, it was recognized that there is a need to define a terminology to describe the full anatomic extent of spread of CRC. Furthermore, we note that there are several additional features, derived from both clinical and pathology information, which have had prognostic significance shown by appropriately constructed multivariate analyses and which can be used to formulate a more accurate prognostic index than that provided by a description of anatomical tumour spread. Thus the Working Party came to two principal conclusions. First, a standard format should be adopted for the collection of the essential data required for prospective studies, and we recommend the ‘International Documentation System (IDS) for CRC’ for this purpose. Second, a nomenclature which describes the full anatomical extent of tumour spread and residual tumour status in CRC has been defined and should be adopted, from which all currently used staging systems can be derived. We have called this nomenclature the ‘International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT) for CRC'. In the event that these recommendations are adopted, we envision that there will be improved clarity in the documentation of treatment outcome for patients with CRC and improved communication of results derived from prospective studies. Furthermore, an acceptance of IDS and ICAT would set the scene to develop a prognostic index for individual patients with CRC by the expansion of anatomical clinicopathology staging information to include additional factors which have independent prognostic significance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
(1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82982-6 · Cited by 16,049
Statistical Methods in Medical Research.
Armitage, P. (1972) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2556182 · Cited by 4,029
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?
Heald, R. J., Husband, E. M., & Ryall, R. D. H. (1982) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800691019 · Cited by 2,917
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870
LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA DUE TO INADEQUATE SURGICAL RESECTION
Quirke, P., Dixon, M. F., Durdey, P., & Williams, N. S. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92612-7 · Cited by 1,973
Spiess, P. E., Lee, A. K., Leibovici, D., Wang, X., Do, K., & Pisters, L. L. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21979 · Cited by 1,930
Feinstein, A. R., Sosin, D. M., & Wells, C. K. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198506203122504 · Cited by 1,544
The classification of cancer of the rectum
Dukes, C. E. (1932) · The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology · doi:10.1002/path.1700350303 · Cited by 1,505
Cited by
Walker, K. G., Bell, S. W., Rickard, M. J. F. X., Mehanna, D., Dent, O. F., Chapuis, P. H., & Bokey, E. L. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133186.81222.08 · Cited by 451
Self-citationChen, S. L., & Bilchik, A. J. (2006) · Transactions of the ... Meeting of the American Surgical Association · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000237655.11717.50 · Cited by 366
PRALL, F. (2004) · Human Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2004.01.022 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- FIELDING, L. P., ARSENAULT, P. A., CHAPUIS, P. H., DENT, O., GATHRIGHT, B., HARDCASTLE, J. D., HERMANEK, P., JASS, J. R., & NEWLAND, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-344
- ISSN
- 0815-9319 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1746
- OpenAlex
- W1980518057
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1746.1991.tb00867.x
- The paper
- FIELDING, L. P., ARSENAULT, P. A., CHAPUIS, P. H., DENT, O., GATHRIGHT, B., HARDCASTLE, J. D., HERMANEK, P., JASS, J. R., & NEWLAND, R. C. (1991). Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.1991.tb00867.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.