Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT)

FIELDING, L. P., ARSENAULT, P. A., CHAPUIS, P. H., DENT, O., GATHRIGHT, B., HARDCASTLE, J. D., HERMANEK, P., JASS, J. R., NEWLAND, R. C.·1991·Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

The purpose of tumour staging for colorectal cancer (CRC) is to help define clinical management, facilitate communication between physicians, provide a basis for stratification and analysis of treatment results in prospective studies, and provide some prognostic information for patients and their families. The World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, and Coloproctology, Working Party on staging for CRC studied six commonly used systems to review their strengths and weaknesses. Although it was concluded that defining a new staging system was unnecessary, it was recognized that there is a need to define a terminology to describe the full anatomic extent of spread of CRC. Furthermore, we note that there are several additional features, derived from both clinical and pathology information, which have had prognostic significance shown by appropriately constructed multivariate analyses and which can be used to formulate a more accurate prognostic index than that provided by a description of anatomical tumour spread. Thus the Working Party came to two principal conclusions. First, a standard format should be adopted for the collection of the essential data required for prospective studies, and we recommend the ‘International Documentation System (IDS) for CRC’ for this purpose. Second, a nomenclature which describes the full anatomical extent of tumour spread and residual tumour status in CRC has been defined and should be adopted, from which all currently used staging systems can be derived. We have called this nomenclature the ‘International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT) for CRC'. In the event that these recommendations are adopted, we envision that there will be improved clarity in the documentation of treatment outcome for patients with CRC and improved communication of results derived from prospective studies. Furthermore, an acceptance of IDS and ICAT would set the scene to develop a prognostic index for individual patients with CRC by the expansion of anatomical clinicopathology staging information to include additional factors which have independent prognostic significance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1991.tb00867.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
FIELDING, L. P., ARSENAULT, P. A., CHAPUIS, P. H., DENT, O., GATHRIGHT, B., HARDCASTLE, J. D., HERMANEK, P., JASS, J. R., & NEWLAND, R. C.
Venue
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-08
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
325-344
ISSN
  • 0815-9319 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1746
OpenAlex
W1980518057
Cited by
416
References
43
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1746.1991.tb00867.x
The paper
FIELDING, L. P., ARSENAULT, P. A., CHAPUIS, P. H., DENT, O., GATHRIGHT, B., HARDCASTLE, J. D., HERMANEK, P., JASS, J. R., & NEWLAND, R. C. (1991). Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.1991.tb00867.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.