The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antituberculosis drug‐induced hepatotoxicity: Concise up‐to‐date review
Open accessAbstract
The cornerstone of tuberculosis management is a 6‐month course of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol. Compliance is crucial for curing tuberculosis. Adverse effects often negatively affect the compliance, because they frequently require a change of treatment, which may have negative consequences for treatment outcome. In this paper we review the incidence, pathology and clinical features of antituberculosis drug‐induced hepatotoxicity, discuss the metabolism and mechanisms of toxicity of isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide, and describe risk factors and management of antituberculosis drug‐induced hepatotoxicity. The reported incidence of antituberculosis drug‐induced hepatotoxicity, the most serious and potentially fatal adverse reaction, varies between 2% and 28%. Risk factors are advanced age, female sex, slow acetylator status, malnutrition, HIV and pre‐existent liver disease. Still, it is difficult to predict what patient will develop hepatotoxicity during tuberculosis treatment. The exact mechanism of antituberculosis drug‐induced hepatotoxicity is unknown, but toxic metabolites are suggested to play a crucial role in the development, at least in the case of isoniazid. Priorities for future studies include basic studies to elucidate the mechanism of antituberculosis drug‐induced hepatotoxicity, genetic risk factor studies and the development of shorter and safer tuberculosis drug regimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, W. M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra021844 · Cited by 1,594
Criteria of drug-induced liver disorders
(1990) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/0168-8278(90)90124-a · Cited by 1,106
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury
Andrade, R. J., Aithal, G. P., Björnsson, E. S., Kaplowitz, N., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Larrey, D., & Karlsen, T. H. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014 · Cited by 1,276
Andrade, R. J., Chalasani, N., Björnsson, E. S., Suzuki, A., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Watkins, P. B., Devarbhavi, H., Merz, M., Lucena, M. I., Kaplowitz, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0105-0 · Cited by 924
Drug-induced liver injury: Asia Pacific Association of Study of Liver consensus guidelines
Devarbhavi, H., Aithal, G., Treeprasertsuk, S., Takikawa, H., Mao, Y., Shasthry, S. M., Hamid, S., Tan, S. S., Philips, C. A., George, J., et al. (2021) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-021-10144-3 · Cited by 181
PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for N-acetyltransferase 2
McDonagh, E. M., Boukouvala, S., Aklillu, E., Hein, D. W., Altman, R. B., & Klein, T. E. (2014) · Pharmacogenetics and Genomics · doi:10.1097/fpc.0000000000000062 · Cited by 146
Drug-induced liver injury: Is it somehow foreseeable?
Tarantino, G., Minno, M. N. D. D., & Capone, D. (2009) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.15.2817 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Tostmann, A., Boeree, M. J., Aarnoutse, R. E., De Lange, W. C. M., Van Der Ven, A. J. A. M., & Dekhuijzen, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-202
- ISSN
- 0815-9319 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1746
- OpenAlex
- W2020976497
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.