Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospects for urinary proteomics: Exosomes as a source of urinary biomarkers (Review Article)

Open access
HOORN, EWOUT J, PISITKUN, TRAIRAK, ZIETSE, ROBERT, GROSS, PETER, FROKIAER, JOERGEN, WANG, NAM SUN, GONZALES, PATRICIA A, STAR, ROBERT A, KNEPPER, MARK A·2005·Nephrology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Recent progress in biotechnology offers the promise of better medical care at lower costs. Among the techniques that show the greatest promise is mass spectrometry of proteins, which can identify proteins present in body fluids and tissue specimens at a large scale. Because urine can be collected in large amounts in a non‐invasive fashion, the potential exists to use mass spectrometry to discover urinary biomarkers that are early predictors of renal disease, or useful in making therapeutic choices. Recently, the authors demonstrated that both membrane proteins and cytosolic proteins from renal epithelia are highly enriched in low‐density urinary structures identified as exosomes. Exosomes were found to contain many disease‐associated proteins including aquaporin‐2, polycystin‐1, podocin, non‐muscle myosin II, angiotensin‐converting enzyme, Na+K+2Cl‐ cotransporter (NKCC2), thiazide‐sensitive Na‐Cl cotransporter (NCC), and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). Potentially, other disease biomarkers could be discovered by mass spectrometry‐based proteomic studies in well‐defined patient populations. Herein is described the advantages of using urinary exosomes as a starting material for biomarker discovery. In addition, the purpose of this review is to present an overall strategy for biomarker discovery in urine using exosomes and for developing cost‐effective clinical assays for these biomarkers, which can potentially be used for early detection of disease, as a means of differential diagnosis, or as a means of guiding therapy. Finally, potential barriers that need to be overcome before urinary proteomics can be applied clinically, are emphasized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00387.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
HOORN, E. J., PISITKUN, T., ZIETSE, R., GROSS, P., FROKIAER, J., WANG, N. S., GONZALES, P. A., STAR, R. A., & KNEPPER, M. A.
Venue
Nephrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
283-290
ISSN
  • 1320-5358 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1797
OpenAlex
W2060271559
Cited by
171
References
3
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospects for urinary proteomics: Exosomes as a source of urinary biomarkers (Review Article). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00387.x
The paper
HOORN, E. J., PISITKUN, T., ZIETSE, R., GROSS, P., FROKIAER, J., WANG, N. S., GONZALES, P. A., STAR, R. A., & KNEPPER, M. A. (2005). Prospects for urinary proteomics: Exosomes as a source of urinary biomarkers (Review Article). Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00387.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.