Cited by 57Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHealth and Well-being StudiesMental Health Treatment and Access

Local community intervention through depression screening and group activity for elderly suicide prevention

Open access
OYAMA, HIROFUMI, ONO, YUTAKA, WATANABE, NAOKI, TANAKA, ERIKO, KUDOH, SEIJIRO, SAKASHITA, TOMOE, SAKAMOTO, SHINJI, NEICHI, KEIKO +3 more·2006·Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to evaluate outcomes of a community‐based program to prevent suicide among the elderly (≥65 years old) using a quasi‐experimental design with two neighboring references. During 1999–2004, the program including depression screening and group activity was conducted by the public health nurses in the Minami district (population 1685) of Nagawa town, rural Japan. Pre‐post changes in the risk of completing suicide were estimated by the incidence rate ratios (IRR). The risk for Minami's elderly females was reduced by 74% (age‐adjusted IRR, 0.26; 90% CI, 0.07–0.98) more than the historical trend, while there was no change in the risk of Minami's males and nor in the male or female references. The local intervention using public health nursing would be effective against suicide for elderly females without diffusing to the surroundings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01468.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training primary care doctors and nurses to better screen and treat depression, with supplemental psychiatric help, lowered suicide rates.

    “Training primary care doctors and nurses at the local and state level to better screen and treat depression with supplemental help available from psychiatrists, lowered suicide rates,(12–19) nonfatal suicide attempts(20, 21) and ideation(22) (Table 2).”

    From Improving Suicide Prevention Through Evidence-Based Strategies: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction (page not specified) describes depression screening by trained public health nurses, and the Discussion reports a 74% reduction in suicide risk among elderly women in the intervention area, but not among men. The intervention also included psychoeducation and group activities; the Discussion says it cannot determine which component accounted for the reduction. The paper does not describe training primary care doctors to screen and treat depression, although it records occasional referrals to psychiatrists. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. Lönngvist JK. Psychiatric aspects of suicide behavior: depression. In: Hawton K, van Heeringen K (eds). The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Sui- cide . John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000; 107-120.
  2. [7]7. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology , 2nd edn. Lippincott-Ravan, Philadelphia, 1998.
  3. [8]8. Agresti A. Categorical Date Analysis , 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002.
  4. [10]10. Shah A, De T. Suicide and elderly. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 1998; 2 : 3-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OYAMA, H., ONO, Y., WATANABE, N., TANAKA, E., KUDOH, S., SAKASHITA, T., SAKAMOTO, S., NEICHI, K., SATOH, K., NAKAMURA, K., & YOSHIMURA, K.
Affiliations
  • Aomori University of Health and Welfare (JP)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Ohara Memorial Institute for Science of Labour (JP)
  • Iwate Prefectural University (JP)
  • Nihon University (JP)
  • Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Research Institute (JP)
Corresponding author
OYAMA, HIROFUMI
Venue
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
110-114
ISSN
  • 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1819
OpenAlex
W2091475046
Cited by
57
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression screening, group activities, community-based intervention, public health nursing, suicide risk, older women, rural Japan
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Community Mental Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Mass Screening, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Public Health Nursing, Reference Values, Risk, Rural Population, Sex Factors, Suicide, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review