Cited by 92Global Health Workforce IssuesLanguage Development and DisordersTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Barriers to accessing rural paediatric speech pathology services: Health care consumers’ perspectives

O'Callaghan, Anna M., McAllister, Lindy, Wilson, Linda·2005·Australian Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

Objective: An investigation of consumers’ perceived barriers to access paediatric speech pathology services. Design: Self‐administered, mail‐out questionnaire. Setting: Rural and remote New South Wales (NSW). Subjects: Three hundred and twenty‐nine members of the NSW branch of the Isolated Children's and Parents’ Association. Results: Consumers living in rural and remote areas experience a number of barriers that affected their ability to access speech pathology services. These barriers include the lack, and limited choice, of speech pathologists in rural areas; long distances to travel to access services, expensive travel costs, lack of public transport; poor awareness of speech pathology services; and delays in treatment due to waiting lists. Conclusion: Barriers to access paediatric speech pathology services limit rural and remote consumers’ usage of health services, regardless of need, indicating a possible inequity if compared to larger, more accessible urban areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1854.2005.00686.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limited access to practitioners who can provide clinical diagnoses based on LSA outcomes due to costs and poor availability in areas where service does not meet community demand can further drive inequity and discrimination.

    “Moreover, limited access to practitioners who can provide clinical diagnoses based on LSA outcomes (e.g., Speech-Language Pathologists [SLPs]) due to costs and poor availability in areas where service does not meet community demand (Lim et al., 2017; McAllister et al., 2011) can further drive inequity and discrimination (O'Callaghan et al., 2005; Verdon et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Callaghan, A. M., McAllister, L., & Wilson, L.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Venue
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
162-171
ISSN
  • 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1584
OpenAlex
W2038069222
Cited by
92
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Speech Pathology Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
barriers to health care access, rural health care, remote areas, health care utilization, travel cost, waiting lists, health service awareness, health disparities, customer perspective, New South Wales
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, New South Wales, Pediatrics, Professional Practice Location, Surveys and Questionnaires, Speech Therapy, Transportation, Rural Health Services, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review