Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: Review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues

Botlero, Roslin, Urquhart, Donna M, Davis, Susan R, Bell, Robin J·2008·International Journal of Urology

Abstract

Objectives: Urinary incontinence in women is common and has a significant impact on the physical, psychological and socio‐economic aspects of life. The aims of this study were to review the published reports on the prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in Australian women and to examine the methodological issues associated with these studies. Methods: Electronic searches of Medline, EMBASE and the Current Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were undertaken using ‘Medical Subject Heading’ terms and ‘free text’ words. We retrieved papers that investigated the prevalence and/or incidence of urinary incontinence in Australian women and were published in English after 1980. Methodological data from each study were tabulated. Results: Seven studies were identified which examined the prevalence of urinary incontinence and two studies that reported its incidence. The prevalence of urinary incontinence varied between 12.8% and 46.0%. Study heterogeneity was a consequence of response rates, the inclusion of women in institutional care, the method of data collection, the questions used to identify different types of urinary incontinence and the way these questions were reported, the period over which the urinary incontinence had occurred and the severity of the incontinence. Two studies which examined incidence provided evidence that urinary incontinence can be a transient phenomenon. Conclusions: Research into the incidence and prevalence of urinary incontinence in Australian women exhibits significant heterogeneity in the findings due to methodological limitations. There is a need for future studies to employ validated instruments and give careful attention to the selection of participants and the reporting of age‐specific data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01976.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Botlero, R., Urquhart, D. M., Davis, S. R., & Bell, R. J.
Venue
International Journal of Urology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-26
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
230-234
ISSN
  • 0919-8172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1442-2042
OpenAlex
W1746933016
Cited by
158
References
0
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: Review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01976.x
The paper
Botlero, R., Urquhart, D. M., Davis, S. R., & Bell, R. J. (2008). Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: Review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues. International Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01976.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.