Cited by 30Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction in women in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Open access
Malaekah, Haifaa, Al Medbel, Haifaa Saud, Al Mowallad, Sameerah, Al Asiri, Zahra, Albadrani, Alhanouf, Abdullah, Hussam·2022·Women's Health

Abstract

Objective: Pelvic floor dysfunction has a high prevalence among women worldwide. However, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, it is underreported. Thus, we aimed to estimate the prevalence and risk factors of pelvic floor dysfunction in women in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on literate non-pregnant women aged ⩾18 years who agreed to participate in our survey. We used the validated and translated Australian pelvic floor questionnaire and conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the risk factors of pelvic floor dysfunction. Results: A total of 824 participants completed the questionnaire. While 60.2% of the participants had pelvic floor dysfunction, 67.7% reported signs of bowel dysfunction. Urinary dysfunction, prolapse, and sexual dysfunction were present in 44.1%, 67.7%, and 55.4% of the participants, respectively. Age, high body mass index, chronic medical illness, heavy weight lifting, and multiparity were found as the risk factors of bladder function problems. Meanwhile, chronic medical illness, heavy weight lifting, and multiparity were found as the risk factors of bowel dysfunction and prolapse. Age group and marital status were the independent factors associated with sexual dysfunction. Conclusion: We noted a high rate of pelvic floor dysfunction in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which calls for the need to provide holistic approaches for the prevention and management of pelvic floor dysfunction among women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/17455065211072252

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings contrast with previous observational studies that reported higher mesh exposure rates when total hysterectomy or vaginal mesh procedures were included.

    “These findings contrast with previous observational studies that reported higher mesh exposure rates when total hysterectomy or vaginal mesh procedures were included [15–24, 29].”

    From Perioperative complications of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrocolpopexy with subtotal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results sections report pelvic floor dysfunction and prolapse symptoms, not mesh exposure rates. A search of our full-text copy for mesh exposure, total hysterectomy, and vaginal mesh procedures found no passage addressing the claimed comparison; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]World Population Review. Saudi Arabia population 2021, https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/saudi-arabia-population (2021, accessed 23 September 2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malaekah, H., Al Medbel, H. S., Al Mowallad, S., Al Asiri, Z., Albadrani, A., & Abdullah, H.
Affiliations
  • Soliman Fakeeh Hospital (SA)
  • General Surgery Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
Corresponding author
Malaekah, Haifaa
Venue
Women's Health
Published
2022-01
Volume
18
Pages
17455065211072252-17455065211072252
ISSN
  • 1745-5057 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-5065
OpenAlex
W4210560729
Cited by
30
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women s Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic floor dysfunction, prevalence, risk factors, women, urinary dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction, body mass index, multiparity, heavy weight lifting, chronic disease, Saudi Arabia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fecal Incontinence, Female, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saudi Arabia, Urinary Incontinence, Prevalence, Pelvic Floor, Pelvic Floor Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review