The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters
Abstract
Abstract R iver I n V ertebrate P rediction A nd C lassification S ystem (rivpacs) is a software package developed by the Institute of Freshwater Ecology (IFE) for assessing the biological quality of rivers in the United Kingdom. The system can be used to generate site‐specific predictions of the macroinvertebrate fauna to be expected in the absence of major environmental stress. Each prediction is based on a small number of environmental features that are used to characterize the site. The fauna predicted can then be compared with the fauna observed at the same site. This offers a procedure for evaluating biological quality with application in river management both at the local level and for national surveys. Close collaboration between the IFE team and biologists in the water industry during the project had a beneficial influence on the operational development of the system. A second feature of RIVPACS is the national classification of sites, based on the macro‐invertebrate fauna. Although the classification is currently a pre‐requisite for the prediction system, it also has intrinsic value because newly sampled sites of high biological quality can be placed within the national framework, based on their macroinvertebrate fauna. This facility is of interest to the statutory nature conservation bodies as an element in their site appraisal procedures. The predictive component of the current version of the system (RIVPACS n) was used in the 1990 River Quality Survey to assess the biological quality of almost 9000 sites throughout the United Kingdom. Further developmental work is now under way to provide a more comprehensive version of the system for the 1995 survey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems
Allan, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122 · Cited by 3,626
Poff, N. L. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468026 · Cited by 1,833
Reynoldson, T. B., Norris, R. H., Resh, V. H., Day, K. E., & Rosenberg, D. M. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468175 · Cited by 641
Taxonomy and stream ecology—The benefits of genus- and species-level identifications
Lenat, D. R., & Resh, V. H. (2001) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468323 · Cited by 384
The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models
VAUGHAN, I. P., & ORMEROD, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01052.x · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- WRIGHT, J. F.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-197
- ISSN
- 0307-692X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097752321
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00531.x
- The paper
- WRIGHT, J. F. (1995). Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00531.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.