The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools
Open accessAbstract
Anatomy instruction at Australian and New Zealand medical schools has been the subject of considerable debate recently. Many commentators have lamented the gradual devaluation of anatomy as core knowledge in medical courses. To date, much of this debate has been speculative or anecdotal and lacking reliable supporting data. To provide a basis for better understanding and more informed discussion, this study analyses how anatomy is currently taught and assessed in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. A mailed questionnaire survey was sent to each of the 19 Australian and 2 New Zealand medical schools, examining the time allocation, content, delivery and assessment of anatomy for the 2008 academic year. Nineteen of the 21 (90.5%) universities invited to participate completed the survey. There was considerable variability in the time allocation, content, delivery and assessment of anatomy in Australasian medical schools. The average total hours of anatomy teaching for all courses was 171 h (SD ± 116.7, range 56/560). Historical data indicate a major decline in anatomy teaching hours within medical courses in Australia and New Zealand. Our results reveal that as there is no national curriculum for anatomy instruction, the curriculum content, instruction methodology and assessment is highly variable between individual institutions. Such variability in anatomy teaching and assessment raises an important question: is there also variable depth of understanding of anatomy between graduates of different medical courses?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anatomy 1999–2000: the curriculum, who teaches it and how?
Heylings, D. J. A. (2002) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01272.x · Cited by 259
Problem‐based learning: its rationale and efficacy
Finucane, P. M., Johnson, S. M., & Prideaux, D. J. (1998) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb139025.x · Cited by 173
Anatomy Instruction in Medical Schools: Connecting the Past and the Future
Leung, K.-K., Lu, K., Huang, T., & Hsieh, B. (2006) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-005-1256-1 · Cited by 127
Problem‐based learning: does it prepare medical students to become better doctors?
Schmidt, H. G. (1998) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb139020.x · Cited by 42
Cited by
Anatomy education for the YouTube generation
Barry, D. S., Marzouk, F., Chulak‐Oglu, K., Bennett, D., Tierney, P., & O'Keeffe, G. W. (2016) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1550 · Cited by 313
Felszeghy, S., Pasonen-Seppänen, S., Koskela, A., Nieminen, P., Härkönen, K., Paldanius, K. M. A., Gabbouj, S., Ketola, K., Hiltunen, M., Lundin, M., et al. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1701-0 · Cited by 258
Teaching, Learning and Assessing Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence: The Road to a Better Future
Abdellatif, H., Al Mushaiqri, M., Albalushi, H., Al-Zaabi, A. A., Roychoudhury, S., & Das, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192114209 · Cited by 120
Artificial intelligence and clinical anatomical education: Promises and perils
Lazarus, M. D., Truong, M., Douglas, P., & Selwyn, N. (2024) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2221 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, S., Tait, N., Boers, D., & McAndrew, D.
- Venue
- ANZ Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03-22
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 212-216
- ISSN
- 1445-1433 (ISSN-L)
- 1445-2197
- OpenAlex
- W1996286032
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05241.x
- The paper
- Craig, S., Tait, N., Boers, D., & McAndrew, D. (2010). Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05241.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.