Cited by 116Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAnatomy and Medical TechnologyArtificial Intelligence in Education

Artificial intelligence and clinical anatomical education: Promises and perils

Open access
Lazarus, Michelle D., Truong, Mandy, Douglas, Peter, Selwyn, Neil·2024·Anatomical Sciences Education

Abstract

Anatomy educators are often at the forefront of adopting innovative and advanced technologies for teaching, such as artificial intelligence (AI). While AI offers potential new opportunities for anatomical education, hard lessons learned from the deployment of AI tools in other domains (e.g., criminal justice, healthcare, and finance) suggest that these opportunities are likely to be tempered by disadvantages for at least some learners and within certain educational contexts. From the perspectives of an anatomy educator, public health researcher, medical ethicist, and an educational technology expert, this article examines five tensions between the promises and the perils of integrating AI into anatomy education. These tensions highlight the ways in which AI is currently ill‐suited for incorporating the uncertainties intrinsic to anatomy education in the areas of (1) human variations, (2) healthcare practice, (3) diversity and social justice, (4) student support, and (5) student learning. Practical recommendations for a considered approach to working alongside AI in the contemporary (and future) anatomy education learning environment are provided, including enhanced transparency about how AI is integrated, AI developer diversity, inclusion of uncertainty and anatomical variations within deployed AI, provisions made for educator awareness of AI benefits and limitations, building in curricular “AI‐free” time, and engaging AI to extend human capacities. These recommendations serve as a guiding framework for how the clinical anatomy discipline, and anatomy educators, can work alongside AI, and develop a more nuanced and considered approach to the role of AI in healthcare education.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This descriptive article examines the promises and perils of integrating existing artificial intelligence into clinical anatomy education, arguing that AIEd can support scalable, consistent tasks but may undermine uncertainty tolerance, diversity, inclusion, and educator-student interaction. It identifies five tensions and offers recommendations for transparent, co-designed, uncertainty-aware, and human-led AI integration.

Key findings

  • The authors identify five tensions between AI features and anatomy education risks: (1) anatomical structure, (2) healthcare practice, (3) diversity/inclusion/social justice, (4) student support, and (5) student learning engagement.
  • AI is described as well-suited to “Googleable” anatomy, pattern recognition, object matching, and image identification, and may benefit novice or struggling students through individually targeted, immediate feedback.
  • Risks include decreased awareness of human variation, reinforcement of bias from unrepresentative training data, automation bias, de-professionalization of educators, surveillance pedagogy, and students learning to “game the system.”
  • The article cites a Human Rights Watch report reviewing 164 EdTech products across 49 countries, finding that 89% monitored or had the capacity to monitor students and harvest personal data without consent.

Methods

  • Design: descriptive article exploring the question “To what extent can existing AI enhance and/or support effective anatomy education?” through five tensions between AI promises and perils.
  • Data/sample: no primary empirical sample; the authors draw on relevant literature within anatomy education, higher education, and healthcare practice.
  • Main analysis: conceptual synthesis and argument, including a summary table of tensions and recommendations for integrating AI into anatomy education.

Limitations

  • The paper states that AIEd is still in its infancy and that many tensions are translations or extrapolations from higher education and healthcare literature, so it remains to be seen how far they predict future impacts in clinical anatomy education.
  • The paper states it focused exclusively on existing AI and did not explore artificial general intelligence.
  • The text makes evident that this is not a primary study or systematic review; the authors call for further primary studies exploring AIEd impacts in anatomy classrooms.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ase.2221

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 77 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationcitation

    Human educators can benefit from being relieved of routine teaching tasks, allowing them to concentrate on higher-level pedagogical work such as curriculum design.

    “Human educators can also benefit from being relieved of routine teaching tasks (e.g., attendance, marking etc.) allowing them to concentrate on higher-level pedagogical work such as curriculum design (Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Individuals less tolerant of uncertainty are more likely to suffer psychological distress and burnout.

    “more likely to suffer psychological distress and burnout (Hancock & Mattick, 2020)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hancock & Mattick, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Discussions about AI in anatomy education all too often fail to engage with literature raising concerns about the social impacts of AI.

    “Nonetheless, these discussions all too often fail to engage with the burgeoning literature raising concerns about the social impacts of AI (Eubanks, 2018;Benjamin, 2019;Pasquale, 2019;Katz, 2020;Lanier & Weyl, 2020;Chun, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Eubanks, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Benjamin, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pasquale, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Students often struggle with managing the differences between textbook and digital abstractions of anatomy and the anatomy explored through human donor dissection.

    “Students often struggle with managing the differences between textbook and digital abstractions of anatomy and the anatomy explored through human donor dissection (Stephens et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stephens et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Incorporating AI into anatomy education is gaining traction, in part as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic educational context.

    “Incorporating AI into anatomy education is similarly gaining traction, in part as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic educational context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pather et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sun et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Harmon et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Existing AI cannot match the full capabilities of human clinicians or educators, but can carry out specific tasks at high speed, at large scale, and with remarkable consistency.

    “As such, existing AI cannot match the full capabilities of human clinicians or educators, but can carry out specific tasks at high speed, at large scale, and with remarkable consistency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Historical approaches to anatomy education were disrupted during the Covid-19 pandemic, with remote teaching nearly universally shared by the anatomy discipline at some point between 2020 and 2022.

    “Historical approaches to anatomy education were disrupted during the Covid-19 pandemic, with the onset of remote teaching which was nearly universally shared by the anatomy discipline at some point between 2020 and 2022 (Pather et al., 2020;Sun et al., 2020;Harmon et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pather et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sun et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Harmon et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The collective pandemic experience has led to some calls to further integrate AI into anatomy education as an ongoing standard teaching tool, with select groups of students and educators valuing these technological advances over traditional person-led teaching approaches like dissection.

    “This collective experience has led to some calls to further integrate AI into anatomy education as an ongoing standard teaching tool, with select groups of students and educators valuing these technological advances over traditional person-led teaching approaches like dissection (Papa et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Papa et al., 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AIEd offers opportunities for enhanced consistency and precision across anatomy education delivery and assessments, and capacity to detect issues and patterns that may otherwise go undetected by humans.

    “This AIEd also offers opportunities for enhanced consistency and precision across anatomy education delivery and assessments, as well as the capacity to detect issues and patterns that may otherwise go undetected by humans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The ability for AI to be rapidly adapted and adopted into anatomy classrooms could make it more influential than other, less technological, anatomy teaching tools.

    “Furthermore, the ability for AI to be rapidly adapted and adopted into anatomy classrooms could make it more influential than these other, less technological, anatomy teaching tools.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Anatomy education is brimming with uncertainty.

    “Many in the anatomy community acknowledge that anatomy education is brimming with uncertainty (Evans et al., 2018;Stephens et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Evans et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stephens et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Clinical anatomy educators are embracing uncertainties relating to individual variation and diversity of the human form, ambiguities of dissection, and the breadth of content required for effective healthcare practice.

    “Clinical anatomy educators are embracing uncertainties relating to issues such as individual variation and diversity of the human form (Willan & Humpherson, 1999;Wheble & Channon, 2021;Cullinane & Barry, 2022), the ambiguities of dissection (e.g., differences between textbook anatomy and that found through dissection) (Stephens et al., 2021), and the sheer breadth of content required for effective”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Willan & Humpherson, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wheble & Channon, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cullinane & Barry, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Incorporating AI into anatomy education may provide unique benefits but may also have unintended consequences.

    “Incorporating AI into anatomy education may therefore provide unique benefits, but there may also be unintended consequences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI excels in areas such as pattern recognition, object matching, and image identification.

    “Artificial intelligence excels in areas such as pattern recognition, object matching, and image identification (Bundy, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bundy, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Integrating opportunities for learners to practice and develop uncertainty tolerance in anatomical education is one way of preparing students for this healthcare competency.

    “Integrating opportunities for learners to practice and develop their uncertainty tolerance in anatomical education is one way of preparing students for this healthcare competency (Domen, 2016;Papanagnou et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Domen, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Papanagnou et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI developers require precision and definitive categorization, and operate under the pragmatic expectation that AI technologies function in social settings in ways that are broadly quantifiable, calculable, and capable of operating effectively given correct inputs.

    “Artificial intelligence developers require precision and definitive categorization, and operate under the pragmatic expectation that AI technologies function in social settings (such as the anatomy classroom) in ways that are broadly quantifiable, calculable, and capable of operating effectively given the correct inputs (Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data, therefore biases may be newly created or reinforced depending on the representativeness of the data these tools are trained upon.

    “The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data, therefore, biases may be newly created or reinforced depending on the representativeness of the data these tools are trained upon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anatomical education has progressed over the past 20 years to better reflect the clinical relevance of human anatomical variation, and is now calling into question historical and contemporary anatomical representations that fail to consider differences based on race, skin tone, sex, gender, body type, and age.

    “Anatomical education has progressed over the past 20 years to better reflect the clinical relevance of human anatomical variation (Willan & Humpherson, 1999;Wheble & Channon, 2021;Cullinane & Barry, 2022), and is now calling into question historical and contemporary anatomical representations that fail to consider differences based on race, skin tone, sex, gender, body type, and age (Liscum &”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Willan & Humpherson, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wheble & Channon, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cullinane & Barry, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is increasing awareness of and attention to the potential for AI to reinforce, hide, or accelerate racism and other forms of discrimination across multiple spheres of life.

    “There is increasing awareness of, and attention to, the potential for AI to reinforce, hide, or accelerate racism and other forms of discrimination across multiple spheres of life (Benjamin, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Benjamin, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Chatbots trained on a corpus of online interactions tend to be unreliable conveyors of information, which can result in undesirable or unintended lines of communication.

    “Here, too, chatbots trained on a corpus of online interactions (e.g., from Reddit) tend to be unreliable conveyors of information, which can result in undesirable or unintended lines of communication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Integrating AI into anatomy education to support and evaluate learners is tempting given the large and sustained teaching load of anatomy educators globally.

    “Integrating AI into anatomy education to support and evaluate learners is tempting given the large and sustained teaching load of anatomy educators globally, from the United States (Heylings, 2002;Drake et al., 2009;McBride & Drake, 2018), to Australia and New Zealand (Craig et al., 2010;Trautman et al., 2019) and China (Pan et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Heylings, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Drake et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McBride & Drake, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a danger that overly prescriptive AI diagnostics may further hinder students' uncertainty tolerance, giving them a flattened sense of the ambiguities and uncertainties intrinsic in human anatomy.

    “As such, there is a danger that overly prescriptive AI diagnostics may further hinder students' uncertainty tolerance, giving them a flattened sense of the ambiguities and uncertainties intrinsic in human anatomy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing AI models are trained on mainly European or East Asian populations, hence adoption of such models in AIEd has the potential to train students to poorly identify melanomas in dark-skinned people, reinforcing bias from lack of diversity in anatomy textbooks.

    “According to Young and colleagues, existing AI models are trained on mainly European or East Asian populations, hence the adoption of such models in AIEd has the potential to train students to poorly identify melanomas in dark-skinned people, reinforcing the bias that result from the lack of diversity in anatomy textbooks (Young et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Young et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The uncritical integration of AI into anatomy teaching may influence students' perceptions and treatment of diverse patients when they become clinicians, which could lead to unequal healthcare provision.

    “The broader concern here is that the uncritical integration of AI into anatomy teaching may influence students' perceptions and treatment of diverse patients when they become clinicians, which could lead to unequal healthcare provision.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Automation bias is the tendency for human agents to rely on automated cues to the point of failing to notice anomalies undetected by the automated system, or by ignoring contradictory information.

    “This is supported by the well-documented concern with automation bias, which is the tendency for human agents to rely on automated cues to the point of failing to notice anomalies undetected by the automated system, or by ignoring contradictory information (Mosier & Skitka, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mosier & Skitka, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Expert human educators have a range of qualities that AIEd does not.

    “Importantly, expert human educators have a range of qualities that AIEd does not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Automation bias is reported in healthcare, where use of clinical decision-support systems leads to clinicians failing to notice problems (unless alerted) and complying with incorrect recommendations.

    “Automation bias is reported in a range of domains, including healthcare, where the use of clinical decision-support systems leads to clinicians failing to notice problems (unless alerted to them), as well as complying with incorrect recommendations (Lyell et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lyell et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sometimes hidden within tasks such as responding to students' routine questions or identifying absent students is a prompt for more extended student-teacher interactions.

    “Sometimes hidden within these tasks, such as responding to students' routine questions or identifying absent students, is a prompt for more extended student-teacher interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrating AIEd without considering these limitations may lead to a de-professionalization of the anatomical educator.

    “Integrating AIEd without considering these limitations may also lead to a de-professionalization of the anatomical educator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Relying on AI for these aspects of anatomy education will require human deliberation to determine whether the data collected by the AI warrants further action.

    “Thus, relying on AI for these aspects of anatomy education will require human deliberation to determine whether the data collected by the AI warrants further action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI systems that claim to analyze student learning vastly reduce the act of studying (let alone learning) to a very limited set of variables.

    “Artificial intelligence systems that claim to analyze student learning vastly reduce the act of studying (let alone learning) to a very limited set of variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Human teachers can make social connections with students, improvise when needed, and use interpersonal skills to motivate, cajole, and enthuse.

    “Human teachers can also make social connections with students, improvise when needed and use their interpersonal skills to motivate, cajole, and enthuse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Education requires acts of creativity, innovation, and spontaneity.

    “Education requires acts of creativity, innovation, and spontaneity (Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Automated essay grading is based on text pattern matching, and so is not capable of discerning meaning and nuance in written expression, which disadvantages students who use nonconventional phrasing and vocabulary.

    “Automated essay grading is based on text pattern matching, and so is not capable of discerning meaning and nuance in written expression which disadvantages students who use nonconventional phrasing and vocabulary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Recommending which piece of work to tackle next or assessing learners' written work requires holistic awareness of both the student and the disciplinary content being taught.

    “For example, recommending which piece of work to tackle next or assessing learners' written work requires holistic awareness of both the student and the disciplinary content being taught.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Anatomy educators are well-placed to support AI development that is fit-for-purpose.

    “Anatomy educators are, thus, well-placed to support AI development that is fit-for-purpose, and are strongly encouraged to engage with this process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    How AI is engaged in anatomical teaching can model how students will interact with AI as professionals.

    “How AI is engaged in anatomical teaching can model how students will interact with AI as professionals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrating AI without also engaging in discourse about how it perpetuates these historical biases undermines the important work being done.

    “Integrating AI without also engaging in discourse about how it perpetuates these historical biases undermines the important work being done.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The AI community suffers from not seeing how its work fits into a long history of science being used to legitimize violence against marginalized people, and to stratify and separate people.

    “the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Noorden, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI tools have value in a number of areas of anatomical education, especially where they can replicate diagnostic and identification functions that AI plays in contemporary clinical practice, and where they genuinely free educators up from nonpedagogical tasks in ways that do not diminish social contact with students.

    “Artificial intelligence tools have value in a number of areas of anatomical education-especially where they can replicate the diagnostic and identification functions that AI plays in contemporary clinical practice, and also where they genuinely free educators up from nonpedagogical tasks in ways that do not diminish social contact with students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Encouraging human educators to lead the teaching, with AIEd in a supportive role, will help generate an effective balance of the efficiencies of AI and the uncertainties of the very human clinical anatomy context.

    “Encouraging human educators to”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Effective education requires pedagogical content knowledge, which represents teaching proficiency and course content knowledge expertise.

    “Effective education requires pedagogical content knowledge, which represents teaching proficiency and course content knowledge expertise (Shulman, 1987).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shulman, 1987

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Another recent publication describes an alternate example wherein AI curriculum was built around a series of lectures designed to help radiology residents gain insight and understanding of AI algorithms.

    “Another recent publication describes an alternate example wherein AI curriculum was built around a series of lectures designed to help radiology residents gain insight and understanding of AI algorithms (Lindqwister et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lindqwister et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    This study revealed participant's had an increased confidence in interpreting and working alongside AI in the workplace after partaking in these professional development opportunities.

    “This study revealed participant's had an increased confidence in interpreting and working alongside AI in the workplace after partaking in these professional development opportunities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lindqwister et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The opportunities provided by AI in terms of scaling, speed, consistency, and precision are the result of the same factors that challenge anatomy educators' capacity to highlight and communicate this anatomic uncertainty to their healthcare students.

    “The opportunities provided by AI in terms of scaling, speed, consistency, and precision are the result of the same factors that challenge anatomy educators' capacity to highlight and communicate this anatomic”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This type of AI surveillance can impact negatively on the trust necessary for effective educational environments, and can also hinder transformative learning that typically occurs in un-assessed components of curriculum.

    “This type of AI surveillance can impact negatively on the trust necessary for effective educational environments (Gubbins & MacCurtain, 2008), and can also hinder the type of transformative learning that typically occurs in un-assessed components of curriculum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gubbins & MacCurtain, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These programs provided opportunities to work with AI developers or solve problems using AI.

    “These programs provided opportunities to work with AI developers or solve problems using AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paranjape et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Anatomy education, through increased transparency and discussions about AI frailties, can help students challenge the presumption that the technology is always right, a necessary competency for an AI-laden healthcare future.

    “Anatomy education, through increased transparency and discussions about AI frailties, can help students challenge the presumption that the technology is”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent report by Human Rights Watch reviewed 164 EdTech products deployed across 49 countries, finding that 89% of them had monitored or had the capacity to monitor students and harvest their personal data without consent, as well as tracking students across the internet and over time.

    “For example, a recent report by Human Rights Watch (2022) reviewed 164 EdTech products deployed across 49 countries, finding that 89% of them had monitored or had the capacity to monitor students and harvest their personal data without consent, as well as tracking students across the internet and over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Human Rights Watch, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

44 of 44
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The number of entirely novel gross anatomical structures identified in recent years is limited.

    “Despite popular media attention (Coffey, 2022), the number of entirely novel gross anatomical structures identified in recent years is limited.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Anatomy research investigations tend to focus on the changeable clinical applications of anatomy.

    “Anatomy research is ongoing, but these investigations tend to focus on the changeable clinical applications of anatomy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    As clinical anatomy research reveals more nuanced attachment sites and innervations, the healthcare application of anatomy changes.

    “As clinical anatomy research reveals more nuanced attachment sites and innervations, the healthcare application of anatomy changes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a need for updated anatomical attachments impacting surgical repair or revising structural innervation.

    “Similarly, there is a need for updated anatomical attachments impacting surgical repair or revising structural innervation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinical knowledge is not based solely on objective facts and procedural decision-making, but also on nuanced judgment and the capacity to deal with ambiguous and complex information.

    “It is also recognized that clinical knowledge is not based solely on objective facts and procedural decision-making, but also on the development of nuanced judgment and the capacity to deal with ambiguous (e.g., borderline diagnostic results) and complex information (e.g., treatment plans for patients with comorbidities)-all hallmarks of clinical uncertainty.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data.

    “The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data, therefore, biases may be newly created or reinforced depending on the representativeness of the data these tools are trained upon.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Continuous AI monitoring of students can result, indirectly, with students fearful and/or hesitant to make mistakes or play around, both necessary for long-term and effective learning.

    “Continuous AI monitoring of students can result, indirectly, with students fearful and/or hesitant to”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Human educators often struggle representing spatial areas such as the middle ear or the pterygopalatine fossa.

    “Another example could be focusing AIEd development on challenging spatial areas such as the middle ear or the pterygopalatine fossa-areas where human educators often struggle representing themselves.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI development is influenced by considerations that are predominately external to both anatomy education and healthcare practice, and undertaken by those far less familiar with how, and to what extent, these psychosocial skills and professional attributes impact on anatomy education and patient care.

    “This concern is compounded by the fact that AI development is influenced by considerations that are predominately external to both anatomy education and healthcare practice, and undertaken by those far less familiar with how, and to what extent, these psychosocial skills and professional attributes impact on anatomy education and patient care.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The field of AIEd is still in its infancy.

    “The field of AIEd is still in its infancy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Community members, including marginalized groups, are impacted by how future healthcare providers perceive patient anatomy and can provide further insight into considered AI development.

    “Community members, including marginalized groups, are impacted by how future healthcare providers perceive patient anatomy and can provide further insight into considered AI development.”
11 of 11

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Alexa article has conflicting publication years

    Minor

    The reference lists Yang's article as published in 2011, but the same entry gives its publication date as 29 December 2021.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. AHRQ, 2018, National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report 2018, 222
  2. Briggs S., 2014, Intelligent tutoring systems ‐ Can they work for you?
  3. Bulger M., 2016, Personalized learning: The conversations we're not having, Data Soc, 22, 1
  4. HTA, 1982, Authorised Version No. 044. Human Tissue Act 1982. No. 9860 of 1982. Authorised Version incorporating amendments as at 30 October 2014, 66
  5. Human Rights Watch, 2022, How Dare you Peep into my Private Life?: Children's Rights Violations by Governments that Endorsed Online Learning During the Covid‐19 Pandemic, 107
  6. Lanier J, 2020, AI is an ideology, not a technology
  7. Lazarus MD, 2021, Preparing Today's Learners for Uncertainty, 4
  8. Marsh P., 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists 69th Annual Scientific Meeting (RANZCR 2018)
  9. Mosier KL, 2018, Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, 201
  10. Pasquale F., 2019, The second wave of algorithmic accountability
  11. Pasquale FA, 2020, Is Law Computable?: Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence, 1
  12. Petress KC, 2004, The benefits of group study, Education, 124, 557
  13. Siddarth D, 2021, How AI Fails Us, 21
  14. Wong M., 2021, What is an AI intelligent tutoring system and why you should use it
  15. Yang M., 2011, Amazon's Alexa device tells 10‐year‐old to touch a penny to a live plug socket

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazarus, M. D., Truong, M., Douglas, P., & Selwyn, N.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
Corresponding author
Lazarus, Michelle D.
Venue
Anatomical Sciences Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-08
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
249-262
ISSN
  • 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-9780
OpenAlex
W4293388027
Cited by
116
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anatomical Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, clinical anatomy education, anatomy education, human diversity, student support, AI ethics, AI transparency, anatomy curriculum, medical education technology
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Artificial Intelligence, Curriculum, Educational Status, Humans, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review