Artificial intelligence and clinical anatomical education: Promises and perils
Open accessAbstract
Anatomy educators are often at the forefront of adopting innovative and advanced technologies for teaching, such as artificial intelligence (AI). While AI offers potential new opportunities for anatomical education, hard lessons learned from the deployment of AI tools in other domains (e.g., criminal justice, healthcare, and finance) suggest that these opportunities are likely to be tempered by disadvantages for at least some learners and within certain educational contexts. From the perspectives of an anatomy educator, public health researcher, medical ethicist, and an educational technology expert, this article examines five tensions between the promises and the perils of integrating AI into anatomy education. These tensions highlight the ways in which AI is currently ill‐suited for incorporating the uncertainties intrinsic to anatomy education in the areas of (1) human variations, (2) healthcare practice, (3) diversity and social justice, (4) student support, and (5) student learning. Practical recommendations for a considered approach to working alongside AI in the contemporary (and future) anatomy education learning environment are provided, including enhanced transparency about how AI is integrated, AI developer diversity, inclusion of uncertainty and anatomical variations within deployed AI, provisions made for educator awareness of AI benefits and limitations, building in curricular “AI‐free” time, and engaging AI to extend human capacities. These recommendations serve as a guiding framework for how the clinical anatomy discipline, and anatomy educators, can work alongside AI, and develop a more nuanced and considered approach to the role of AI in healthcare education.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This descriptive article examines the promises and perils of integrating existing artificial intelligence into clinical anatomy education, arguing that AIEd can support scalable, consistent tasks but may undermine uncertainty tolerance, diversity, inclusion, and educator-student interaction. It identifies five tensions and offers recommendations for transparent, co-designed, uncertainty-aware, and human-led AI integration.
Key findings
- The authors identify five tensions between AI features and anatomy education risks: (1) anatomical structure, (2) healthcare practice, (3) diversity/inclusion/social justice, (4) student support, and (5) student learning engagement.
- AI is described as well-suited to “Googleable” anatomy, pattern recognition, object matching, and image identification, and may benefit novice or struggling students through individually targeted, immediate feedback.
- Risks include decreased awareness of human variation, reinforcement of bias from unrepresentative training data, automation bias, de-professionalization of educators, surveillance pedagogy, and students learning to “game the system.”
- The article cites a Human Rights Watch report reviewing 164 EdTech products across 49 countries, finding that 89% monitored or had the capacity to monitor students and harvest personal data without consent.
Methods
- Design: descriptive article exploring the question “To what extent can existing AI enhance and/or support effective anatomy education?” through five tensions between AI promises and perils.
- Data/sample: no primary empirical sample; the authors draw on relevant literature within anatomy education, higher education, and healthcare practice.
- Main analysis: conceptual synthesis and argument, including a summary table of tensions and recommendations for integrating AI into anatomy education.
Limitations
- The paper states that AIEd is still in its infancy and that many tensions are translations or extrapolations from higher education and healthcare literature, so it remains to be seen how far they predict future impacts in clinical anatomy education.
- The paper states it focused exclusively on existing AI and did not explore artificial general intelligence.
- The text makes evident that this is not a primary study or systematic review; the authors call for further primary studies exploring AIEd impacts in anatomy classrooms.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 77 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationcitation
Human educators can benefit from being relieved of routine teaching tasks, allowing them to concentrate on higher-level pedagogical work such as curriculum design.
“Human educators can also benefit from being relieved of routine teaching tasks (e.g., attendance, marking etc.) allowing them to concentrate on higher-level pedagogical work such as curriculum design (Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Individuals less tolerant of uncertainty are more likely to suffer psychological distress and burnout.
“more likely to suffer psychological distress and burnout (Hancock & Mattick, 2020)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hancock & Mattick, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Discussions about AI in anatomy education all too often fail to engage with literature raising concerns about the social impacts of AI.
“Nonetheless, these discussions all too often fail to engage with the burgeoning literature raising concerns about the social impacts of AI (Eubanks, 2018;Benjamin, 2019;Pasquale, 2019;Katz, 2020;Lanier & Weyl, 2020;Chun, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Eubanks, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Benjamin, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pasquale, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Students often struggle with managing the differences between textbook and digital abstractions of anatomy and the anatomy explored through human donor dissection.
“Students often struggle with managing the differences between textbook and digital abstractions of anatomy and the anatomy explored through human donor dissection (Stephens et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Incorporating AI into anatomy education is gaining traction, in part as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic educational context.
“Incorporating AI into anatomy education is similarly gaining traction, in part as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic educational context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pather et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sun et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Harmon et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Individuals less tolerant of uncertainty are less likely to have positive attitudes to patient populations who have been marginalized in society.
“less likely to have positive attitudes to patient populations who have been marginalized in society (Wayne et al., 2011)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wayne et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Individuals less tolerant of uncertainty are more likely to engage in paternalistic approaches to patient care.
“more likely to engage in paternalistic approaches to patient care (Geller et al., 1993)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geller et al., 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Individuals less tolerant of uncertainty are more likely to over-order tests and refer patients inappropriately.
“Considering that those who are less tolerant of uncertainty are more likely to over-order tests and refer patients inappropriately (Geller et al., 1993;Forrest et al., 2006;Strout et al., 2018)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Geller et al., 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Forrest et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Strout et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The anatomy learning environment is a robust context for fostering learner uncertainty tolerance.
“Given that previous research identified that the anatomy learning environment is a robust context for fostering learner uncertainty tolerance (Stephens et al., 2021)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
AIEd offers benefits including working at scales and speeds not possible by human educators.
“Artificial intelligence-infused anatomical education comes with appealing promises and potential benefits, including the scope of these technologies to work at scales and speeds not otherwise possible by human educators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI systems such as facial recognition tools often use machine learning algorithms trained with labeled data to discriminate human features based on categories such as race, including in healthcare settings.
“Artificial intelligence systems such as facial recognition tools often use machine learning algorithms that are trained with labeled data to discriminate human features based on categories such as race, including in healthcare settings (Ledford, 2019;Obermeyer et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ledford, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Obermeyer et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The mismatch between skill development and AIEd capacity is often due to a disciplinary divide between engineers/computer scientists designing AI tools and the end users (future healthcare professionals and anatomy educators).
“The mismatch between the skill development and AIEd capacity is often due to what Schiff et al. (2021) refer to as a disciplinary divide between the engineers and computer scientists designing and developing AI tools, and the population making up the tools' end users (e.g., future healthcare professionals and anatomy educators).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schiff et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
This can prompt student reflection, questioning, and more complex sense-making in a way that supports previously identified methods for developing uncertainty tolerance in the anatomy learning environment.
“This can prompt student's reflection, questioning, and more complex sense-making in a way that supports previously identified methods for developing uncertainty tolerance in the anatomy learning environment (Lazarus, 2021;Moffett et al., 2021;Stephens et al., 2021;Lazarus et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lazarus, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Moffett et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stephens et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
An over-reliance on AI for anatomy teaching may result in the loss of opportunities to develop critical skills.
“An over-reliance on AI for anatomy teaching may result in the loss of opportunities to develop these critical skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Uncertainties permeate most aspects of medicine, including differential diagnosis, treatment recommendations, diagnostic interpretation, and prognosis.
“Uncertainties permeate most aspects of medicine, including in the contexts of differential diagnosis, treatment recommendations, diagnostic interpretation, and prognosis (Hillen et al., 2017;Strout et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hillen et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Strout et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
AIEd does not currently support the diversity of the human form robustly.
“Artificial intelligence-infused anatomical education does not currently support this diversity of the human form robustly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Training AI tools on a corpus of actual clinical cases and decisions runs the risk of perpetuating and even exacerbating social biases and discrimination already present in current healthcare practice.
“The process of training AI tools on a corpus of actual clinical cases and decisions (e.g., in the form of electronic medical records) runs the risk of perpetuating and even exacerbating the social biases and discrimination already present in current healthcare practice (AHRQ, 2018;Egede & Walker, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites AHRQ, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Egede & Walker, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
If development of AI tools relies mostly on images of melanomas on fair-skinned people, they will likely fail to adequately detect melanoma on images of lesions in darker-skinned people.
“However, if the development of AI tools relies mostly on images of melanomas on fair-skinned people, which also occurs in mainstream medical textbooks (Louie & Wilkes, 2018;Massie, 2021), they will likely fail to adequately detect melanoma on images of lesions in darker-skinned people (Adamson & Smith, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Louie & Wilkes, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Massie, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Adamson & Smith, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Delegating some aspects of anatomy teaching to AIEd diminishes educator-student interactions.
“Despite promises of studentcentered and targeted learning strategies, delegating some aspects of anatomy teaching to AIEd diminishes educator-student interactions (Pasquale, 2020;Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pasquale, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Online learner engagement may actually occur outside learning management systems (e.g., via social media).
“Not only are there offline strategies which are effective for supporting learning (above), but online learner engagement may actually occur outside learning management systems (LMS) (e.g., via social media) (Crawford, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crawford, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI is increasingly trusted in its decision-making and recommendations.
“This is, in part, because AI is increasingly trusted in its decision-making and recommendations (Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Effective study strategies often rely on learning approaches that do not directly engage technology, such as group study, physical copying of notes with pen and paper, and reviewing prior printed or written notes.
“Effective study strategies often rely on learning approaches that do not directly engage technology (i.e., occur 'offline'), such as group study (Petress, 2004;Pollock et al., 2011;Van Wyk & Haffejee, 2017), the physical copying of notes with pen and paper (Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014), and reviewing prior printed or written notes (Putnam et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Petress, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pollock et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Wyk & Haffejee, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
An expert human teacher is able to support learning in ways that cannot currently be fully replicated through technology.
“As such, an expert human teacher is able to support learning in ways that cannot currently be fully replicated through technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
There is a risk that these systems will be used with lower-paid teaching assistants who may not have the pedagogical content knowledge to interrogate the AI-led analysis.
“Moreover, there is also a risk that these systems will be used with lower-paid teaching assistants who may not have the pedagogical content knowledge (Shulman, 1987) to interrogate the AI-led analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shulman, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Reliance on limited variables for making decisions about student learning may generate an inequitable learning environment for diverse student populations.
“This reliance on limited variables for making decisions about student learning may generate an inequitable learning environment for diverse student populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Facial recognition remains challenging due to AI's reliance on limited, observable visual cues.
“Facial recognition remains challenging due to AI's reliance on limited, observable visual cues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Much of the drudge work and low-level tasks that AI systems promise to relieve educators of are quite complex and pedagogically significant moments.
“In particular, much of the 'drudge' work and low-level tasks that AI systems promise to relieve educators of are quite complex and pedagogically significant moments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Teaching demands a tolerance of imprecision, messiness, and not knowing, all qualities that AI is unable to replicate.
“Teaching also demands a tolerance of imprecision, messiness, and not knowing, all qualities that AI is unable to replicate (Saltman, 2020;Gallagher & Breines, 2021;Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Saltman, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gallagher & Breines, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Facial analysis systems continue to not register and/or mis-recognize faces that diverge from those of white males, most notoriously those with darker skin tones.
“Moreover, facial analysis systems continue to not register and/or mis-recognize faces that diverge from those of white males, most notoriously those with darker skin tones (Andrejevic & Selwyn, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Andrejevic & Selwyn, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
These data were shared with advertising technology companies to target students with behavioral advertising.
“These data were shared with advertising technology companies to target students with behavioral advertising.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Human Rights Watch, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
If the learner is unaware of being surveilled, questions about ethical standards arise.
“If the learner is unaware of being surveilled, questions about ethical standards arise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Prior co-designing initiatives have proven both valuable and successful for all participants in relation to both the process and the resulting learning outcomes.
“Prior co-designing initiatives have proven both valuable and successful for all participants in relation to both the process and the resulting learning outcomes (de Carvalho Filho et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Carvalho Filho et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Continually collected background data can indirectly result in identifying lauded or criticized learner behaviors that may not represent the realities of effective education.
“This means that continually collected background data can indirectly result in identifying lauded or criticized learner behaviors that may not represent the realities of effective education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The anatomy discipline is actively engaging in interrogating and challenging the historically patriarchal and racially biased foundations of anatomy and anatomy education.
“The anatomy discipline is actively engaging in interrogating and challenging the historically patriarchal and racially biased foundations of anatomy and anatomy education (Finn et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Finn et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the past 20 years there is growing recognition that anatomical education cannot ignore the human capacity for complex thought, ethical and moral decisions, the ability to manage uncertainty and novelty, and transparency-all attributes that existing AI cannot replicate.
“However, in the past 20 years there is growing recognition that anatomical education cannot ignore the human capacity for complex thought, ethical and moral decisions, the ability to manage uncertainty and novelty (e.g., uncertainty tolerance), and transparency-all attributes that existing AI cannot replicate (Stewart et al., 2018;He et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Stewart et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites He et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
This can result in supporting inappropriate learner standardizations, where students could begin to internalize that the expectation is submission of perfected answers.
“This can then result in supporting inappropriate learner standardizations, where students could begin to internalize that the expectation is submission of perfected answers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This could lead to incorrect AI reporting.
“Additionally, this could lead to incorrect AI reporting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A report in 2019 explored different healthcare education programs which helped participant's awareness and knowledge of AI.
“A report in 2019 explored different healthcare education programs which helped participant's awareness and knowledge of AI (Paranjape et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paranjape et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 21
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExisting AI cannot match the full capabilities of human clinicians or educators, but can carry out specific tasks at high speed, at large scale, and with remarkable consistency.
“As such, existing AI cannot match the full capabilities of human clinicians or educators, but can carry out specific tasks at high speed, at large scale, and with remarkable consistency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHistorical approaches to anatomy education were disrupted during the Covid-19 pandemic, with remote teaching nearly universally shared by the anatomy discipline at some point between 2020 and 2022.
“Historical approaches to anatomy education were disrupted during the Covid-19 pandemic, with the onset of remote teaching which was nearly universally shared by the anatomy discipline at some point between 2020 and 2022 (Pather et al., 2020;Sun et al., 2020;Harmon et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pather et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sun et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Harmon et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe collective pandemic experience has led to some calls to further integrate AI into anatomy education as an ongoing standard teaching tool, with select groups of students and educators valuing these technological advances over traditional person-led teaching approaches like dissection.
“This collective experience has led to some calls to further integrate AI into anatomy education as an ongoing standard teaching tool, with select groups of students and educators valuing these technological advances over traditional person-led teaching approaches like dissection (Papa et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Papa et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAIEd offers opportunities for enhanced consistency and precision across anatomy education delivery and assessments, and capacity to detect issues and patterns that may otherwise go undetected by humans.
“This AIEd also offers opportunities for enhanced consistency and precision across anatomy education delivery and assessments, as well as the capacity to detect issues and patterns that may otherwise go undetected by humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe ability for AI to be rapidly adapted and adopted into anatomy classrooms could make it more influential than other, less technological, anatomy teaching tools.
“Furthermore, the ability for AI to be rapidly adapted and adopted into anatomy classrooms could make it more influential than these other, less technological, anatomy teaching tools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnatomy education is brimming with uncertainty.
“Many in the anatomy community acknowledge that anatomy education is brimming with uncertainty (Evans et al., 2018;Stephens et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Evans et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stephens et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClinical anatomy educators are embracing uncertainties relating to individual variation and diversity of the human form, ambiguities of dissection, and the breadth of content required for effective healthcare practice.
“Clinical anatomy educators are embracing uncertainties relating to issues such as individual variation and diversity of the human form (Willan & Humpherson, 1999;Wheble & Channon, 2021;Cullinane & Barry, 2022), the ambiguities of dissection (e.g., differences between textbook anatomy and that found through dissection) (Stephens et al., 2021), and the sheer breadth of content required for effective”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Willan & Humpherson, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wheble & Channon, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cullinane & Barry, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncorporating AI into anatomy education may provide unique benefits but may also have unintended consequences.
“Incorporating AI into anatomy education may therefore provide unique benefits, but there may also be unintended consequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI excels in areas such as pattern recognition, object matching, and image identification.
“Artificial intelligence excels in areas such as pattern recognition, object matching, and image identification (Bundy, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bundy, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntegrating opportunities for learners to practice and develop uncertainty tolerance in anatomical education is one way of preparing students for this healthcare competency.
“Integrating opportunities for learners to practice and develop their uncertainty tolerance in anatomical education is one way of preparing students for this healthcare competency (Domen, 2016;Papanagnou et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Domen, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Papanagnou et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI developers require precision and definitive categorization, and operate under the pragmatic expectation that AI technologies function in social settings in ways that are broadly quantifiable, calculable, and capable of operating effectively given correct inputs.
“Artificial intelligence developers require precision and definitive categorization, and operate under the pragmatic expectation that AI technologies function in social settings (such as the anatomy classroom) in ways that are broadly quantifiable, calculable, and capable of operating effectively given the correct inputs (Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data, therefore biases may be newly created or reinforced depending on the representativeness of the data these tools are trained upon.
“The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data, therefore, biases may be newly created or reinforced depending on the representativeness of the data these tools are trained upon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnatomical education has progressed over the past 20 years to better reflect the clinical relevance of human anatomical variation, and is now calling into question historical and contemporary anatomical representations that fail to consider differences based on race, skin tone, sex, gender, body type, and age.
“Anatomical education has progressed over the past 20 years to better reflect the clinical relevance of human anatomical variation (Willan & Humpherson, 1999;Wheble & Channon, 2021;Cullinane & Barry, 2022), and is now calling into question historical and contemporary anatomical representations that fail to consider differences based on race, skin tone, sex, gender, body type, and age (Liscum &”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Willan & Humpherson, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wheble & Channon, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cullinane & Barry, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is increasing awareness of and attention to the potential for AI to reinforce, hide, or accelerate racism and other forms of discrimination across multiple spheres of life.
“There is increasing awareness of, and attention to, the potential for AI to reinforce, hide, or accelerate racism and other forms of discrimination across multiple spheres of life (Benjamin, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Benjamin, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChatbots trained on a corpus of online interactions tend to be unreliable conveyors of information, which can result in undesirable or unintended lines of communication.
“Here, too, chatbots trained on a corpus of online interactions (e.g., from Reddit) tend to be unreliable conveyors of information, which can result in undesirable or unintended lines of communication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntegrating AI into anatomy education to support and evaluate learners is tempting given the large and sustained teaching load of anatomy educators globally.
“Integrating AI into anatomy education to support and evaluate learners is tempting given the large and sustained teaching load of anatomy educators globally, from the United States (Heylings, 2002;Drake et al., 2009;McBride & Drake, 2018), to Australia and New Zealand (Craig et al., 2010;Trautman et al., 2019) and China (Pan et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Heylings, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Drake et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McBride & Drake, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThere is a danger that overly prescriptive AI diagnostics may further hinder students' uncertainty tolerance, giving them a flattened sense of the ambiguities and uncertainties intrinsic in human anatomy.
“As such, there is a danger that overly prescriptive AI diagnostics may further hinder students' uncertainty tolerance, giving them a flattened sense of the ambiguities and uncertainties intrinsic in human anatomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationExisting AI models are trained on mainly European or East Asian populations, hence adoption of such models in AIEd has the potential to train students to poorly identify melanomas in dark-skinned people, reinforcing bias from lack of diversity in anatomy textbooks.
“According to Young and colleagues, existing AI models are trained on mainly European or East Asian populations, hence the adoption of such models in AIEd has the potential to train students to poorly identify melanomas in dark-skinned people, reinforcing the bias that result from the lack of diversity in anatomy textbooks (Young et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Young et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe uncritical integration of AI into anatomy teaching may influence students' perceptions and treatment of diverse patients when they become clinicians, which could lead to unequal healthcare provision.
“The broader concern here is that the uncritical integration of AI into anatomy teaching may influence students' perceptions and treatment of diverse patients when they become clinicians, which could lead to unequal healthcare provision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAutomation bias is the tendency for human agents to rely on automated cues to the point of failing to notice anomalies undetected by the automated system, or by ignoring contradictory information.
“This is supported by the well-documented concern with automation bias, which is the tendency for human agents to rely on automated cues to the point of failing to notice anomalies undetected by the automated system, or by ignoring contradictory information (Mosier & Skitka, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mosier & Skitka, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenExpert human educators have a range of qualities that AIEd does not.
“Importantly, expert human educators have a range of qualities that AIEd does not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAutomation bias is reported in healthcare, where use of clinical decision-support systems leads to clinicians failing to notice problems (unless alerted) and complying with incorrect recommendations.
“Automation bias is reported in a range of domains, including healthcare, where the use of clinical decision-support systems leads to clinicians failing to notice problems (unless alerted to them), as well as complying with incorrect recommendations (Lyell et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyell et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSometimes hidden within tasks such as responding to students' routine questions or identifying absent students is a prompt for more extended student-teacher interactions.
“Sometimes hidden within these tasks, such as responding to students' routine questions or identifying absent students, is a prompt for more extended student-teacher interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIntegrating AIEd without considering these limitations may lead to a de-professionalization of the anatomical educator.
“Integrating AIEd without considering these limitations may also lead to a de-professionalization of the anatomical educator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningRelying on AI for these aspects of anatomy education will require human deliberation to determine whether the data collected by the AI warrants further action.
“Thus, relying on AI for these aspects of anatomy education will require human deliberation to determine whether the data collected by the AI warrants further action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAI systems that claim to analyze student learning vastly reduce the act of studying (let alone learning) to a very limited set of variables.
“Artificial intelligence systems that claim to analyze student learning vastly reduce the act of studying (let alone learning) to a very limited set of variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHuman teachers can make social connections with students, improvise when needed, and use interpersonal skills to motivate, cajole, and enthuse.
“Human teachers can also make social connections with students, improvise when needed and use their interpersonal skills to motivate, cajole, and enthuse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationEducation requires acts of creativity, innovation, and spontaneity.
“Education requires acts of creativity, innovation, and spontaneity (Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Selwyn & Gallo Cordoba, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAutomated essay grading is based on text pattern matching, and so is not capable of discerning meaning and nuance in written expression, which disadvantages students who use nonconventional phrasing and vocabulary.
“Automated essay grading is based on text pattern matching, and so is not capable of discerning meaning and nuance in written expression which disadvantages students who use nonconventional phrasing and vocabulary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRecommending which piece of work to tackle next or assessing learners' written work requires holistic awareness of both the student and the disciplinary content being taught.
“For example, recommending which piece of work to tackle next or assessing learners' written work requires holistic awareness of both the student and the disciplinary content being taught.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAnatomy educators are well-placed to support AI development that is fit-for-purpose.
“Anatomy educators are, thus, well-placed to support AI development that is fit-for-purpose, and are strongly encouraged to engage with this process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHow AI is engaged in anatomical teaching can model how students will interact with AI as professionals.
“How AI is engaged in anatomical teaching can model how students will interact with AI as professionals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIntegrating AI without also engaging in discourse about how it perpetuates these historical biases undermines the important work being done.
“Integrating AI without also engaging in discourse about how it perpetuates these historical biases undermines the important work being done.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe AI community suffers from not seeing how its work fits into a long history of science being used to legitimize violence against marginalized people, and to stratify and separate people.
“the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Noorden, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI tools have value in a number of areas of anatomical education, especially where they can replicate diagnostic and identification functions that AI plays in contemporary clinical practice, and where they genuinely free educators up from nonpedagogical tasks in ways that do not diminish social contact with students.
“Artificial intelligence tools have value in a number of areas of anatomical education-especially where they can replicate the diagnostic and identification functions that AI plays in contemporary clinical practice, and also where they genuinely free educators up from nonpedagogical tasks in ways that do not diminish social contact with students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningEncouraging human educators to lead the teaching, with AIEd in a supportive role, will help generate an effective balance of the efficiencies of AI and the uncertainties of the very human clinical anatomy context.
“Encouraging human educators to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEffective education requires pedagogical content knowledge, which represents teaching proficiency and course content knowledge expertise.
“Effective education requires pedagogical content knowledge, which represents teaching proficiency and course content knowledge expertise (Shulman, 1987).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shulman, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnother recent publication describes an alternate example wherein AI curriculum was built around a series of lectures designed to help radiology residents gain insight and understanding of AI algorithms.
“Another recent publication describes an alternate example wherein AI curriculum was built around a series of lectures designed to help radiology residents gain insight and understanding of AI algorithms (Lindqwister et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lindqwister et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThis study revealed participant's had an increased confidence in interpreting and working alongside AI in the workplace after partaking in these professional development opportunities.
“This study revealed participant's had an increased confidence in interpreting and working alongside AI in the workplace after partaking in these professional development opportunities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lindqwister et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe opportunities provided by AI in terms of scaling, speed, consistency, and precision are the result of the same factors that challenge anatomy educators' capacity to highlight and communicate this anatomic uncertainty to their healthcare students.
“The opportunities provided by AI in terms of scaling, speed, consistency, and precision are the result of the same factors that challenge anatomy educators' capacity to highlight and communicate this anatomic”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis type of AI surveillance can impact negatively on the trust necessary for effective educational environments, and can also hinder transformative learning that typically occurs in un-assessed components of curriculum.
“This type of AI surveillance can impact negatively on the trust necessary for effective educational environments (Gubbins & MacCurtain, 2008), and can also hinder the type of transformative learning that typically occurs in un-assessed components of curriculum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gubbins & MacCurtain, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese programs provided opportunities to work with AI developers or solve problems using AI.
“These programs provided opportunities to work with AI developers or solve problems using AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paranjape et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAnatomy education, through increased transparency and discussions about AI frailties, can help students challenge the presumption that the technology is always right, a necessary competency for an AI-laden healthcare future.
“Anatomy education, through increased transparency and discussions about AI frailties, can help students challenge the presumption that the technology is”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent report by Human Rights Watch reviewed 164 EdTech products deployed across 49 countries, finding that 89% of them had monitored or had the capacity to monitor students and harvest their personal data without consent, as well as tracking students across the internet and over time.
“For example, a recent report by Human Rights Watch (2022) reviewed 164 EdTech products deployed across 49 countries, finding that 89% of them had monitored or had the capacity to monitor students and harvest their personal data without consent, as well as tracking students across the internet and over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Human Rights Watch, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of entirely novel gross anatomical structures identified in recent years is limited.
“Despite popular media attention (Coffey, 2022), the number of entirely novel gross anatomical structures identified in recent years is limited.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Anatomy research investigations tend to focus on the changeable clinical applications of anatomy.
“Anatomy research is ongoing, but these investigations tend to focus on the changeable clinical applications of anatomy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
As clinical anatomy research reveals more nuanced attachment sites and innervations, the healthcare application of anatomy changes.
“As clinical anatomy research reveals more nuanced attachment sites and innervations, the healthcare application of anatomy changes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a need for updated anatomical attachments impacting surgical repair or revising structural innervation.
“Similarly, there is a need for updated anatomical attachments impacting surgical repair or revising structural innervation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical knowledge is not based solely on objective facts and procedural decision-making, but also on nuanced judgment and the capacity to deal with ambiguous and complex information.
“It is also recognized that clinical knowledge is not based solely on objective facts and procedural decision-making, but also on the development of nuanced judgment and the capacity to deal with ambiguous (e.g., borderline diagnostic results) and complex information (e.g., treatment plans for patients with comorbidities)-all hallmarks of clinical uncertainty.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data.
“The accuracy of AI tools depends on high-volume and high-quality data, therefore, biases may be newly created or reinforced depending on the representativeness of the data these tools are trained upon.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Continuous AI monitoring of students can result, indirectly, with students fearful and/or hesitant to make mistakes or play around, both necessary for long-term and effective learning.
“Continuous AI monitoring of students can result, indirectly, with students fearful and/or hesitant to”
The paper relies on this without support.
Human educators often struggle representing spatial areas such as the middle ear or the pterygopalatine fossa.
“Another example could be focusing AIEd development on challenging spatial areas such as the middle ear or the pterygopalatine fossa-areas where human educators often struggle representing themselves.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI development is influenced by considerations that are predominately external to both anatomy education and healthcare practice, and undertaken by those far less familiar with how, and to what extent, these psychosocial skills and professional attributes impact on anatomy education and patient care.
“This concern is compounded by the fact that AI development is influenced by considerations that are predominately external to both anatomy education and healthcare practice, and undertaken by those far less familiar with how, and to what extent, these psychosocial skills and professional attributes impact on anatomy education and patient care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The field of AIEd is still in its infancy.
“The field of AIEd is still in its infancy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Community members, including marginalized groups, are impacted by how future healthcare providers perceive patient anatomy and can provide further insight into considered AI development.
“Community members, including marginalized groups, are impacted by how future healthcare providers perceive patient anatomy and can provide further insight into considered AI development.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous articles (5%) provide guidelines and "tips" on AI in medical education.
“Numerous articles (5%) provide guidelines and “tips” on AI in medical education [57, 83, 94, 135, 136, 162, 179, 186, 195, 196, 202, 205–210].”
From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [83]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Alexa article has conflicting publication years
MinorThe reference lists Yang's article as published in 2011, but the same entry gives its publication date as 29 December 2021.
“Yang M. 2011. Amazon's Alexa device tells 10-year-old to touch a penny to a live plug socket.”
“The Guardian, 29 December 2021.”
Cites
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787 · see citing works
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · see citing works
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Artificial intelligence systems such as facial recognition tools often use machine learning algorithms that are trained with labeled data to discriminate human features based on categories such as race, including in health-care settings (Ledford, 2019; Obermeyer et al., 2019).”
BackgroundAutomating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor
Lebovits, H. (2018) · Public Integrity · doi:10.1080/10999922.2018.1511671 · Cited by 3,318 · see citing works
The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine
He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
Race after technology. Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code
Merz, S. (2020) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2020.1715454 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
(2016) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614524581 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization
Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A. (2010) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.139 · Cited by 999 · see citing works
Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow
Drake, R. L., McBride, J. M., Lachman, N., & Pawlina, W. (2009) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.117 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates
Selwyn, N. (2011) · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Self-citationBini, S. A. (2018) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.067 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Toward a Normative Definition of Medical Professionalism
Swick, H. M. (2000) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200006000-00010 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Machine Learning and Health Care Disparities in Dermatology
Adamson, A. S., & Smith, A. (2018) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2348 · Cited by 639 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the development of AI tools relies mostly on images of melanomas on fair-skinned people, which also occurs in mainstream medical textbooks (Louie & Wilkes, 2018; Massie, 2021), they will likely fail to adequately detect melanoma on images of lesions in darker-skinned people (Adamson & Smith, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodIntroducing artificial intelligence training in medical education
Paranjape, K., Schinkel, M., Nannan Panday, R., Car, J., & Nanayakkara, P. (2019) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/16048 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
Crawford, K. (2022) · Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith · doi:10.56315/pscf3-22crawford · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Structural Racism, Social Risk Factors, and Covid-19 — A Dangerous Convergence for Black Americans
Egede, L. E., & Walker, R. J. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2023616 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare
Hillen, M. A., Gutheil, C. M., Strout, T. D., Smets, E. M. A., & Han, P. K. J. (2017) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Pather, N., Blyth, P., Chapman, J. A., Dayal, M., Flack, N. A. M. S., Fogg, Q. A., Green, R. A., Hulme, A. K., Johnson, I., Meyer, A. J., et al. (2020) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1968 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Self-citationCoronavirus pushes education online
Sun, L., Tang, Y., & Zuo, W. (2020) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0678-8 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Chun, W. H. K., & Barnett, A. (2021) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14050.001.0001 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk
Yudkowsky, E. (2008) · Global Catastrophic Risks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198570509.003.0021 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Preparing for the future of Artificial Intelligence
Bundy, A. (2017) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-016-0685-0 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education
McBride, J. M., & Drake, R. L. (2017) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1760 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools
Craig, S. J., Tait, N. N., Boers, D., & McAndrew, D. J. (2010) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05241.x · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Bodies for Anatomy Education in Medical Schools: An Overview of the Sources of Cadavers Worldwide
Habicht, J. L., Kiessling, C., & Winkelmann, A. (2018) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002227 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Representations of race and skin tone in medical textbook imagery
Louie, P., & Wilkes, R. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.023 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Strengers, Y., & Kennedy, J. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12482.001.0001 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Facial recognition technology in schools: critical questions and concerns
Andrejevic, M., & Selwyn, N. (2020) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1686014 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationTrelease, R. B. (2016) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1620 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Blikstein, P. (2013) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/2460296.2460316 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Schwedt, T. J. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1416 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
ARBOOK: Development and Assessment of a Tool Based on Augmented Reality for Anatomy
Ferrer‐Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M. A., García, S., & Barcia, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9526-4 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Anatomy 1999–2000: the curriculum, who teaches it and how?
Heylings, D. J. (2002) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01272.x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Primer
Young, A. T., Xiong, M., Pfau, J., Keiser, M. J., & Wei, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.026 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
What’s the Problem with Learning Analytics?
Selwyn, N. (2019) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2019.63.3 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationForrest, C. B., Nutting, P. A., von Schrader, S., Rohde, C. A., & Starfield, B. H. (2006) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x05284110 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Tolerance of uncertainty: A systematic review of health and healthcare-related outcomes
Strout, T. D., Hillen, M. A., Gutheil, C. M., Anderson, E., Hutchinson, R. N., Ward, H., Kay, H. E., Mills, G., & Han, P. K. J. (2018) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.030 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Education and technology: Key issues and debates
Teräs, M. (2022) · International Review of Education · doi:10.1007/s11159-022-09971-9 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Smith, C. F., Tollemache, N., Covill, D., et al. (2017) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1718 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Teacherbot: interventions in automated teaching
Bayne, S. (2015) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well‐being in medical training: A systematic review
Hancock, J., & Mattick, K. L. (2019) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14031 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Molloy, E., & Bearman, M. (2018) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13649 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Geller, G., Tambor, E. S., Chase, G. A., & Holtzman, N. A. (1993) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199311000-00002 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Millions of black people affected by racial bias in health-care algorithms
Ledford, H. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03228-6 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research
Noorden, R. V. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03187-3 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in emergency medicine
Stewart, J. E., Sprivulis, P., & Dwivedi, G. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/1742-6723.13145 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Emerging trends in IoT and big data analytics for biomedical and health care technologies
Banerjee, A., Chakraborty, C., Kumar, A., & Biswas, D. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818318-2.00005-2 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
An Analysis of Anatomy Education Before and During Covid‐19: May–August 2020
Harmon, D., Attardi, S. M., Barremkala, M., Bentley, D. C., Brown, K., Dennis, J. F., Goldman, H. M., Harrell, K. M., Klein, B. A., Ramnanan, C. J., et al. (2021) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2051 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Learning through discussions: comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings
Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.539913 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Littman, M. L., Ajunwa, I., Berger, G., Boutilier, C. E., Currie, M. E., Doshi‐Velez, F., Hadfield, G. K., Horowitz, M. C., Isbell, C. L., Kitano, H., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.15767 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Abstraction and analogy‐making in artificial intelligence
Mitchell, M. (2021) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14619 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Using virtual reality to complement and enhance anatomy education
Erolin, C., Reid, L., & McDougall, S. (2019) · Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine · doi:10.1080/17453054.2019.1597626 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Design, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative anatomy course
Rizzolo, L. J., Rando, W. C., O’Brien, M. K., Haims, A. H., Abrahams, J. J., & Stewart, W. B., Jr. (2010) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.152 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
An intelligent discussion-bot for answering student queries in threaded discussions
Feng, D., Shaw, E., Kim, J., & Hovy, E. H. (2006) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/1111449.1111488 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
A survey of virtual human anatomy education systems
Preim, B., & Saalfeld, P. (2018) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2018.01.005 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Automation bias in electronic prescribing
Lyell, D., Magrabi, F., Raban, M. Z., Pont, L. G., Baysari, M. T., Day, R. O., & Coiera, E. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0425-5 · Cited by 103 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Automation bias is reported in a range of domains, including health-care, where the use of clinical decision-support systems leads to clinicians failing to notice problems (unless alerted to them), as well as complying with incorrect recommendations (Lyell et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAI-RADS: an artificial intelligence curriculum for residents
Lindqwister, A. L., Hassanpour, S., Lewis, P. J., & Sin, J. M. (2021) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.017 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Wayne, S. J., Dellmore, D., Serna, L., et al. (2011) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31821dac01 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Automating Inequality. How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police and Punish the Poor
Marshall, R. C. (2018) · Alternate routes · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Explaining the Principles to Practices Gap in AI
Schiff, D. S., Rakova, B., Ayesh, A., Fanti, A., & Lennon, M. (2021) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2021.3056286 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Rethinking Anatomy: How to Overcome Challenges of Medical Education’s Evolution
Guimarães, B., Dourado, L. G. P., Tsisar, S., Diniz, J. M., Madeira, M. D., & Ferreira, M. A. (2017) · Acta Médica Portuguesa · doi:10.20344/amp.8404 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Scoping review of artificial intelligence and immersive digital tools in dental education
Saghiri, M. A., Vakhnovetsky, J., & Nadershahi, N. (2022) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/jdd.12856 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Understanding the Dynamics of Collective Learning: The Role of Trust and Social Capital
Gubbins, C., & MacCurtain, S. (2008) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/1523422308320372 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Optimizing Learning in College
Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. W., & Roediger, H. L., III (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616645770 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The role of 3D printing in anatomy education and surgical training: A narrative review
Li, K. H. C., Kui, C., Lee, E. K. M., Ho, C. S., Wong, S. H., Wu, W. K. K., Wong, W. T., Voll, J., Li, G., Liu, T., et al. (2017) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.15694/mep.2017.000092 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Ang, E. T., Chan, J.-M., Gopal, V., & Shia, N. L. (2018) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.23249 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
An ethical solution to the challenges in teaching anatomy with dissection in the Chinese culture
Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Xiao, M., et al. (2008) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.15 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Papa, V., Varotto, E., Galli, M., Vaccarezza, M., & Galassi, F. M. (2021) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2162 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Re-imagining ‘Learning Analytics’ … a case for starting again?
Selwyn, N. (2020) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100745 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationAbrams, M. P., Eckert, T., Topping, D., & DALY, K. D. (2020) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2025 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Australian public understandings of artificial intelligence
Selwyn, N., & Cordoba, B. G. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01268-z · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationAtlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
Hankwitz, M. B. (2022) · Leonardo · doi:10.1162/leon_r_02206 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Moffett, J., Hammond, J., Murphy, P., & Pawlikowska, T. R. B. (2021) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-021-10028-z · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Stephens, G. C., Rees, C. E., & Lazarus, M. D. (2020) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-020-09971-0 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationWallach, W., & Vallor, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190905033.003.0014 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Colonization, cadavers, and color: Considering decolonization of anatomy curricula
Finn, G. M., Danquah, A., & Matthan, J. (2022) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.24855 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Human skills for human[istic] anatomy: An emphasis on nontraditional discipline‐independent skills
Evans, D. J. R., Pawlina, W., & Lachman, N. (2018) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1799 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Motivations and Risks of Machine Ethics
Cave, S., Nyrup, R., Vold, K., & Weller, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2865996 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
A Picture of Modern Medicine: Race and Visual Representation in Medical Literature
Massie, J. P., Cho, D., Kneib, C. J., Sousa, J. D., Morrison, S. D., & Friedrich, J. B. (2020) · Journal of the National Medical Association · doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2020.07.013 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Domen, R. E. (2016) · Academic Pathology · doi:10.1177/2374289516654712 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Artificial Whiteness: Politics and Ideology in Artificial Intelligence
Katz, Y. (2020) · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Using a Machine Learning Architecture to Create an AI-Powered Chatbot for Anatomy Education
Li, Y. S., Lam, C. S. N., & See, C. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01405-9 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Shiozawa, T., Glauben, M., Banzhaf, M., Griewatz, J., Hirt, B., Zipfel, S., Lammerding‐Koeppel, M., & Herrmann‐Werner, A. (2019) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1917 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Darras, K. E., de Bruin, A. B. H., Nicolaou, S., et al. (2018) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2018.1451629 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality
Meyer, A. J., Innes, S. I., Stomski, N. J., & Armson, A. J. (2015) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1542 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Phrenoesophageal ligament re-visited
Kwok, H. C. K., Marriz, Y., Al-Ali, S., & Windsor, J. A. (1999) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2353(1999)12:3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Alt‐Epping, B., Lohse, C., Viebahn, C., et al. (2014) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-15 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Update on the mesentery: structure, function, and role in disease
Coffey, J. C., Byrnes, K. G., Walsh, D., & Cunningham, R. M. (2021) · The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00179-5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Towards a medical school curriculum for uncertainty in clinical practice
Papanagnou, D., Ankam, N. S., Ebbott, D., & Ziring, D. J. (2021) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1972762 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Survey of Gross Anatomy Education in China: The Past and the Present
Pan, S., Chan, L. K., Yu, Y., & Yang, X. (2020) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1952 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality
Bourdot, P., Slater, M., Latoschik, M. E., et al. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72323-5 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Saltman, K. J. (2020) · London Review of Education · doi:10.14324/lre.18.2.04 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality
Miedany, Y. M. E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98213-7_20 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Easterling, L., & Byram, J. N. (2022) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.24862 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Inuwa, I. M., Taranikanti, V., Al‐Rawahy, M., & Habbal, O. (2011) · Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · doi:10.18295/2075-0528.1298 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Lazarus, M. D., Gouda‐Vossos, A., Ziebell, A., & Brand, G. (2022) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2174 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationMustafa, A., Allouh, M. Z., Mustafa, I. G., et al. (2013) · Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy · doi:10.1007/s00276-012-1067-z · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Afsharpour, S., Gonsalves, A., Hosek, R. S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Chiropractic Education · doi:10.7899/jce-17-7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
O’Sullivan, S., Heinsen, H., Grinberg, L. T., Chimelli, L. M. C., Amaro, E., Saldiva, P. H. N., Jeanquartier, F., Jean-Quartier, C., Martin, M. D. G. M., Sajid, M. I., et al. (2019) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-019-0096-3 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hayes, J. A., & Temple-Smith, M. J. (2020) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/ajo.13298 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Tağıl, S. M., Özçakar, L., & Bozkurt, M. C. (2005) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.20106 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Lee, L. M. J., Nagel, R. W., & Gould, D. J. (2012) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2012.76.9.tb05374.x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Gallagher, M. S., & Breines, M. R. (2020) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1823411 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Trautman, J., McAndrew, D. J., & Craig, S. J. (2019) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/0004944119878263 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
You can't keep a bad idea down: Dark history, death, and potential rebirth of eugenics
Liscum, M., & Garcia, M. L. (2021) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.24849 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
What Use is Anatomy in First Opinion Small Animal Veterinary Practice? A Qualitative Study
Wheble, R., & Channon, S. B. (2020) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1995 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Anatomy 3.0: Rediscovering Theatrum Anatomicum in the wake of Covid‐19
Filho, C., Hafferty, F. W., & Pawlina, W. (2021) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2130 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Benefits of Group Learning As a Collaborative Strategy in a Diverse Higher Education Context
van Wyk, J. V., & Haffejee, F. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.1080/09751122.2017.1305745 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Re‐examining our roots: Queer history and anatomy
Smith, T. C. (2022) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.24859 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Breaking the norm: Anatomical variation and its key role in medical education
Cullinane, D. P., & Barry, D. (2021) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2141 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Augmented Cognition in the Operating Room
DIAS, R. D., Yule, S., & Zenati, M. A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49100-0_19 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Discovering Generative Uncertainty in Learning Analytics Dashboards
Nguyen, H., Campos, F., & Ahn, J. (2021) · Advances in analytics for learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81222-5_21 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- AHRQ, 2018, National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report 2018, 222
- Briggs S., 2014, Intelligent tutoring systems ‐ Can they work for you?
- Bulger M., 2016, Personalized learning: The conversations we're not having, Data Soc, 22, 1
- HTA, 1982, Authorised Version No. 044. Human Tissue Act 1982. No. 9860 of 1982. Authorised Version incorporating amendments as at 30 October 2014, 66
- Human Rights Watch, 2022, How Dare you Peep into my Private Life?: Children's Rights Violations by Governments that Endorsed Online Learning During the Covid‐19 Pandemic, 107
- Lanier J, 2020, AI is an ideology, not a technology
- Lazarus MD, 2021, Preparing Today's Learners for Uncertainty, 4
- Marsh P., 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists 69th Annual Scientific Meeting (RANZCR 2018)
- Mosier KL, 2018, Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, 201
- Pasquale F., 2019, The second wave of algorithmic accountability
- Pasquale FA, 2020, Is Law Computable?: Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence, 1
- Petress KC, 2004, The benefits of group study, Education, 124, 557
- Siddarth D, 2021, How AI Fails Us, 21
- Wong M., 2021, What is an AI intelligent tutoring system and why you should use it
- Yang M., 2011, Amazon's Alexa device tells 10‐year‐old to touch a penny to a live plug socket
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI in Medical Education: Global situation, effects and challenges
Zhang, W., Cai, M., Lee, H. J., Evans, R., Zhu, C., & Ming, C. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12009-8 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Teaching, Learning and Assessing Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence: The Road to a Better Future
Abdellatif, H., Al Mushaiqri, M., Albalushi, H., Al-Zaabi, A. A., Roychoudhury, S., & Das, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192114209 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Initial impressions of <scp>ChatGPT</scp> for anatomy education
Mogali, S. R. (2024) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2261 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Shaw, K., Henning, M. A., & Webster, C. S. (2025) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-025-02373-0 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review
Simoni, J., Urtubia-Fernandez, J., Mengual, E., Simoni, D. A., Royo, M., Egaña-Yin, D., Hertog, O. L. A., López-Ortiz, L., Muñoz-Tomás, A., Santiago-Martínez, P., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08188-2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Asghar et al. proposed using a humanoid robot as a teaching assistant in anatomy classes [82]; however, some scholars raised concerns that AI might not capture individual anatomical variations [83].”
Cornwall, J., Hildebrandt, S., Champney, T. H., & Goodman, K. (2024) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2335 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Teng, D., Tan, L., Cao, Q., Xia, Y., Zhang, N., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02547-z · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lazarus, M. D., Truong, M., Douglas, P., & Selwyn, N.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lazarus, Michelle D.
- Venue
- Anatomical Sciences Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-10-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-262
- ISSN
- 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-9780
- OpenAlex
- W4293388027
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Anatomical Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, clinical anatomy education, anatomy education, human diversity, student support, AI ethics, AI transparency, anatomy curriculum, medical education technology
- MeSH terms
- Anatomy, Artificial Intelligence, Curriculum, Educational Status, Humans, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review