Cited by 53Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsLipid metabolism and disorders

Triglycerides + high‐density‐lipoprotein‐cholesterol dyslipidaemia, a coronary risk factor in elderly women: the CArdiovascular STudy in the ELderly

Mazza, A., Tikhonoff, V., Schiavon, L., Casiglia, E.·2005·Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract

Abstract Background: The relationship between serum triglycerides (TG) level and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality remains controversial. Aims: To evaluate whether TG level is a risk factor for CHD in elderly people from general population, and to look for interactions between TG and other risk factors. Methods: 3257 subjects aged ≥ 65 years followed up for 12 years from the CArdiovascular STudy in the ELderly. Blood tests and anthropometric measurements were performed. Continuous items were divided into quintiles and, for each quintile, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for CHD mortality was derived by genders from Cox analysis. Results: In women, the HR of being in the fifth rather than in the first quintile of TG was 2.45 (CI 1.48−3.51). In turn, high‐density‐lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) inversely predicted CHD mortality; the HR of being in the first rather than in the fifth quintiles of HDL‐C was 1.52 (CI 1.24−2.36). The risk of CHD mortality further increased up to 3.81 (CI 1.62−5.43) when high TG and low HDL‐C were combined. No predictive role for either TG or HDL‐C was detected in men. Conclusions: TG and HDL‐C were independent predictors of CHD mortality in elderly women. The combination high TG + low HDL‐C quadrupled the risk of CHD mortality in this gender only. (Intern Med J 2005; 35: 604−610)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00940.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazza, A., Tikhonoff, V., Schiavon, L., & Casiglia, E.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Mazza, A.
Venue
Internal Medicine Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
604-610
ISSN
  • 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-5994
OpenAlex
W2019530645
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease mortality, older women, cardiovascular risk factors, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Italy, Cholesterol, HDL, Population Surveillance, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Hypertriglyceridemia, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review