Cited by 126Art Therapy and Mental HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMusic Therapy and Health

Controlled study on the cognitive and psychological effect of coloring and drawing in mild Alzheimer's disease patients

Hattori, Hideyuki, Hattori, Chikako, Hokao, Chieko, Mizushima, Kumiko, Mase, Toru·2011·Geriatrics & Gerontology International

Abstract

Aim: Art therapy has been reported to have effects on mental symptoms in patients with dementia, and its usefulness is expected. We performed a controlled trial to evaluate the usefulness of art therapy compared with calculation training in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. Methods: Thirty‐nine patients with Alzheimer's disease showing slightly decreased cognitive function allowing treatment on an outpatient basis were randomly allocated to art therapy and control (learning therapy using calculation) groups, and intervention was performed once weekly for 12 weeks. Results: Comparison of the results of evaluation between before and after therapy in each group showed significant improvement in the Apathy Scale in the art therapy group (P = 0.014) and in the Mini‐Mental State Examination score (P = 0.015) in the calculation drill group, but no significant differences in the other items between the two groups. Patients showing a 10% or greater improvement were compared between the two groups. Significant improvement in the quality of life (QOL) was observed in the art therapy compared with the calculation training group (P = 0.038, odds ratio, 5.54). anova concerning improvement after each method revealed no significant difference in any item. Conclusion: These results suggested improvement in at least the vitality and the QOL of patients with mild Alzheimer's disease after art therapy compared with calculation, but no marked comprehensive differences between the two methods. In non‐pharmacological therapy for dementia, studies attaching importance to the motivation and satisfaction of patients and their family members rather than the superiority of methods may be necessary in the future. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2011; 11: 431–437.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00698.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hattori, H., Hattori, C., Hokao, C., Mizushima, K., & Mase, T.
Affiliations
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
Corresponding author
Hattori, Hideyuki
Venue
Geriatrics & Gerontology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-26
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
431-437
ISSN
  • 1444-1586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0594
OpenAlex
W1597127835
Cited by
126
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
56.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
art therapy, Alzheimer's disease, mild dementia, apathy, cognitive function, quality of life, non-pharmacological treatment, reminiscence therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Art Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review