CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 163Media and Digital CommunicationDigital Communication and LanguageFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Units of Analysis for Internet Communication

December, John·1996·Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01459.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Journal Article Units of Analysis for Internet Communication Get access John December John December 1John December is a PhD candidate in Communication and Rhetoric at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Communication, Volume 46, Issue 1, March 1996, Pages 14–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01459.x Published: 07 February 2006

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01459.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 1984, Computer-mediated communication as a force in language change, Visible Language, 18, 118
  2. 1995, The world-wide web unleashed
  3. 1986, The muse learn to write: Reflections on orality and literacy from antiquity to the present
  4. 1982, Some of my favorite writers are literate: The mingling of oral and literate strategies in written communication, 239
  5. 1992, Introduction, 1
  6. 1991, Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation, and group decisionmaking, 155
  7. 1990, Computer conferencing in the context of the evolution of media, 3
  8. 1974, Psychological motives and communication gratification, 167
  9. 1967, The medium is the message
  10. 1992, When mediation is the message: How suppliers envisage new markets, 145
  11. 1989, Language, affect, and culture
  12. 1977, Interfaces of the word: Studies in the wolution of consciousness and culture
  13. 1991, Computer mediated communications: Bulletin boards, computer conferencing, electronic mail, and information retriwal
  14. 1983, Diffusion of innovations
  15. 1993, Abductive multiloguing the semiotic dynamics of navigating the net, The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture, 1
  16. 1985, The nature of news gratifications, 171

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 163

Related

Metadata

Authors
December, J.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
December, John
ORCID
December, John
Venue
Journal of Communication
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
14-38
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
DOI
10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01459.x
OpenAlex
W2120062971
Cited by
163
References
54
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 7123 d)
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
unit of analysis, online communication, online discourse, computer-mediated communication, discourse analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review