CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 612Impact of Technology on AdolescentsCyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet Use and Collegiate Academic Performance Decrements: Early Findings

Kubey, Robert W., Lavin, Michael J., Barrows, John R.·2001·Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent research at colleges and universities has suggested that some college students’ academic performance might be impaired by heavier use of the Internet. This study reviews the relevant literature and presents data from a survey of 572 students at a large public university. Heavier recreational Internet use was shown to be correlated highly with impaired academic performance. Loneliness, staying up late, tiredness, and missing class were also intercorrelated with self-reports of Internet-caused impairment. Self-reported Internet dependency and impaired academic performance were both associated with greater use of all Internet applications, but particularly with much greater use of synchronous communication applications such as chat rooms and MUDs, as opposed to asynchronous applications such as email and Usenet newsgroups.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 1999,, Internet use among college students: Should we be concerned?
  2. 1996, BS detector: “Internet addiction” meme gets media high, Wired, 8
  3. 1998, 14, Critics are picking apart a professor's study that linked Internet use to loneliness and depression, C5
  4. 1998, Connecting all Americans for the 21st century: Telecommunications links in low income and rural communities
  5. 1997, Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use in college students
  6. 1984, Mediated group communication, 129
  7. 1999,, The American freshman: National norms for fall 1999
  8. 1997, College life online: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use, Journal of College Student Development, 38, 655

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 610

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J., & Barrows, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • St. Bonaventure University (US)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
366-382
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
DOI
10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x
OpenAlex
W2024372620
Cited by
612
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 36
FWCI
23.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 5205 d)
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet use, academic performance, university students, internet addiction, loneliness, sleep deprivation, missed classes, synchronous communication, chat rooms, mud, email, Usenet newsgroups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review