Exploring How We Enjoy Antihero Narratives: Enjoying Antihero Narratives
Abstract
Affective disposition theory (ADT), which nicely explains enjoyment of traditional hero narratives, appears somewhat limited in its ability to explain antihero narratives, primarily because of the moral complexity of the protagonists. Recent work proposes that viewers over time develop story schema that permit antihero enjoyment, despite character immorality. This article reports results from three studies that support this claim. Specifically, the findings indicate that moral judgment may be less important to antihero enjoyment than ADT would predict, that previous exposure to an antihero narrative alters responses to similar narratives, and that moral disengagement cues impact the enjoyment process. Ultimately, the studies offer empirical evidence of how antihero narratives are enjoyed differently than their traditional hero counterparts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
It's Okay to Shoot a Character: Moral Disengagement in Violent Video Games
Hartmann, T., & Vorderer, P. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01459.x · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Media enjoyment as need satisfaction: the contribution of hedonic and nonhedonic needs
Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., David Bowman, N., Reinecke, L., Lewis, R. J., & Eden, A. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01593.x · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Shafer, D. M., & Raney, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Baylor University (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1028-1046
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1931218588
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 96.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
- Keywords
- narrative enjoyment, affective disposition theory, story schema, moral judgment, moral disengagement, hero narrative, media exposure effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review