Cited by 144Media Influence and HealthNarrative Theory and AnalysisEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

Exploring How We Enjoy Antihero Narratives: Enjoying Antihero Narratives

Shafer, Daniel M., Raney, Arthur A.·2012·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Affective disposition theory (ADT), which nicely explains enjoyment of traditional hero narratives, appears somewhat limited in its ability to explain antihero narratives, primarily because of the moral complexity of the protagonists. Recent work proposes that viewers over time develop story schema that permit antihero enjoyment, despite character immorality. This article reports results from three studies that support this claim. Specifically, the findings indicate that moral judgment may be less important to antihero enjoyment than ADT would predict, that previous exposure to an antihero narrative alters responses to similar narratives, and that moral disengagement cues impact the enjoyment process. Ultimately, the studies offer empirical evidence of how antihero narratives are enjoyed differently than their traditional hero counterparts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01682.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Shafer, D. M., & Raney, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2012-12
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
1028-1046
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1931218588
Cited by
144
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
96.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
narrative enjoyment, affective disposition theory, story schema, moral judgment, moral disengagement, hero narrative, media exposure effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review