The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence that Very Slow Wallerian Degeneration in C57BL/Ola Mice is an Intrinsic Property of the Peripheral Nerve
Abstract
We have described a mutant mouse, C57BL/Ola, in which Wallerian degeneration following peripheral nerve transection is very slow. Our previous results suggested that recruited monocytes play a role in rapid Wallerian degeneration. The nature of the mutation in C57BL/Ola mice is not known and we have investigated whether the defect is intrinsic to the nerve or due to a defect in the circulating monocytes. We have made chimaeric mice in which bone marrow from histocompatible mice, with rapidly degenerating nerves and normal monocyte recruitment, was used to reconstitute irradiated C57BL/Ola mice and vice‐versa. A substantial degree of donor repopulation of the hosts was confirmed by measures of the levels of glucose‐phosphate isomerase alloenzymes in blood and tissue samples from the two different strains. The rate of degeneration of the transected sciatic nerve was found to be host‐dependent, providing evidence that the mutation affects cell populations intrinsic to the nerve and not the circulating monocytes. We provide additional evidence that the peripheral nerves of C57BL/Ola mice are different from those of other mice as they degenerate at a slower rate in vitro.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absence of Wallerian Degeneration does not Hinder Regeneration in Peripheral Nerve
Lunn, E. R., Perry, V. H., Brown, M. C., Rosen, H., & Gordon, S. (1989) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00771.x · Cited by 646
Self-citationMcCarthy, G. F., & Leblond, C. P. (1988) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902710409 · Cited by 134
Cited by
ALS: A Disease of Motor Neurons and Their Nonneuronal Neighbors
Boillée, S., Vande Velde, C., & Cleveland, D. W. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.018 · Cited by 1,429
The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration
Fu, S. Y., & Gordon, T. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740621 · Cited by 1,202
Axon degeneration mechanisms: Commonality amid diversity
Coleman, M. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1788 · Cited by 819
Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration
Scheib, J., & Höke, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.227 · Cited by 758
Axonal Self-Destruction and Neurodegeneration
Raff, M. C., Whitmore, A. V., & Finn, J. T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068613 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Perry, V. H., Brown, M. C., Lunn, E. R., Tree, P., & Gordon, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 802-808
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2138669375
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence that Very Slow Wallerian Degeneration in C57BL/Ola Mice is an Intrinsic Property of the Peripheral Nerve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00472.x
- The paper
- Perry, V. H., Brown, M. C., Lunn, E. R., Tree, P., & Gordon, S. (1990). Evidence that Very Slow Wallerian Degeneration in C57BL/Ola Mice is an Intrinsic Property of the Peripheral Nerve. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00472.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.