The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Neurogenesis in the Chick Retina
Abstract
Chick embryo retinas were labelled in ovo by single injections of [3 H]thymidine at selected times between days 2 and 12 of incubation. Embryos were later removed, at different stages of development, and the retinas processed for autoradiography of either serial sections or dissociated cell preparations. Analysis of unlabelled cells shows that neurogenesis starts, on day 2 of incubation, in a dorsotemporal area of the central retina, close to the posterior pole and to the optic nerve head. A gradient of neurogenesis spreads from this central area to the periphery, where neurogenesis ends, shortly after day 12, when the last few bipolar cells withdraw from the cell cycle. Additional dorsal‐to‐ventral and temporal‐to‐nasal gradients can be discerned in our autoradiographs. In all retinal sectors, ganglion cells start first to withdraw from the cell cycle, followed, with substantial overlapping, by amacrine, horizontal, photoreceptor plus Müller, and bipolar neuroblasts. Ganglion cells are also the first to reach the 50% level of unlabelled cells, followed this time by horizontal, photoreceptor, amacrine, Müller and bipolar cells. Finally, 100% levels of unlabelled cell populations are attained simultaneously by ganglion, horizontal and photoreceptor cells, followed by amacrine, then by Müller, and last by bipolar cells. Although all classes of neurons, in varying proportions, are being produced most of the time, our results also demonstrate that, in any given retinal area, the first cells leaving the cycle are determined to become ganglion cells, and the last ones bipolar cells, and not other types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cell fate determination in the vertebrate retina.
Cepko, C. L., Austin, C. P., Yang, X., Alexiades, M., & Ezzeddine, D. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.2.589 · Cited by 986
Generation of three-dimensional retinal tissue with functional photoreceptors from human iPSCs
Zhong, X., Gutierrez, C., Xue, T., Hampton, C., Vergara, M. N., Cao, L.-H., Peters, A., Park, T. S., Zambidis, E. T., Meyer, J. S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5047 · Cited by 970
Bringmann, A., Iandiev, I., Pannicke, T., Wurm, A., Hollborn, M., Wiedemann, P., Osborne, N. N., & Reichenbach, A. (2009) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.07.001 · Cited by 761
Müller glia are a potential source of neural regeneration in the postnatal chicken retina
Fischer, A. J., & Reh, T. A. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/85090 · Cited by 577
Henrique, D., Hirsinger, E., Adam, J., Roux, I. L., Pourquié, O., Ish-Horowicz, D., & Lewis, J. (1997) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00293-4 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Prada, C., Puga, J., Pérez‐Méndez, L., López, R., & Ramírez, G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 559-569
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2008277743
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Neurogenesis in the Chick Retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1991.tb00843.x
- The paper
- Prada, C., Puga, J., Pérez‐Méndez, L., López, R., & Ramírez, G. (1991). Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Neurogenesis in the Chick Retina. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1991.tb00843.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.