CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112Neuroscience and Music PerceptionAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved cortical entrainment to infant communication calls in mothers compared with virgin mice

Liu, Robert C., Linden, Jennifer F., Schreiner, Christoph E.·2006·European Journal of Neuroscience
DOI 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04840.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the use of mice as a model system for species‐specific communication. In particular, ultrasonic calls emitted by mouse pups communicate distress, and elicit a search and retrieval response from mothers. Behaviorally, mothers prefer and recognize these calls in two‐alternative choice tests, in contrast to pup‐naïve females that do not have experience with pups. Here, we explored whether one particular acoustic feature that defines these calls − the repetition rate of calls within a bout − is represented differently in the auditory cortex of these two animal groups. Multiunit recordings in anesthetized CBA/CaJ mice revealed that: (i) neural entrainment to repeated stimuli extended up to the natural pup call repetition rate (5 Hz) in mothers; but (ii) neurons in naïve females followed repeated stimuli well only at slower repetition rates; and (iii) entrained responses to repeated pup calls were less sensitive to natural pup call variability in mothers than in pup‐naïve females. In the broader context, our data suggest that auditory cortical responses to communication sounds are plastic, and that communicative significance is correlated with an improved cortical representation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04840.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–111 of 111

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Liu, R. C., Linden, J. F., & Schreiner, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Robert C.
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
3087-3097
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
DOI
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04840.x
OpenAlex
W2141066586
Cited by
112
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 8 d)
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (F32DC005279, R01DC002260, F32 DC05279, DC002260)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 34835, P01NS034835)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
maternal behavior, ultrasonic vocalizations, auditory cortex, neural entrainment, maternal experience, auditory plasticity, virgin females
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Auditory Cortex, Behavior, Animal, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Male, Maternal Behavior, Mice, Inbred CBA, Sound Localization, Sound Spectrography, Ultrasonics, Vocalization, Animal, Recognition, Psychology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review