The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision‐making and Weber's law: a neurophysiological model
Abstract
We describe an integrate‐and‐fire attractor model of the decision‐related activity of ventral premotor cortex (VPC) neurons during a vibrotactile frequency comparison task [Romo et al. (2004)Neuron, 41, 165–173]. Populations of neurons for each decision in a biased competition attractor network receive a bias input that depends on the firing rates of VPC neurons that code for the two vibrotactile frequencies. The firing rate of the neurons in whichever attractor wins, reflects the sign of the difference in the frequencies (Δ f) being compared but not the absolute frequencies. However, the transition from the initial spontaneous firing state to one of the two possible attractor states depends probabilistically on the difference of the vibrotactile frequencies scaled by the base frequency. This is due to finite size noise effects related to the spiking activity in the network, and the divisive feedback inhibition implemented through inhibitory interneurons. Thus the neurophysiological basis for a psychophysical effect, Weber's Law, can be related to statistical fluctuations and divisive inhibition in an attractor decision‐making network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements
Carpenter, R. H. S., & Williams, M. L. L. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377059a0 · Cited by 823
Brunel, N., & Wang, X.-J. (2001) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1011204814320 · Cited by 620
Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex
Romo, R., Hernández, A., Zainos, A., Lemus, L., & Brody, C. D. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn950 · Cited by 387
Neuronal Correlates of a Perceptual Decision in Ventral Premotor Cortex
Romo, R., Hernández, A., & Zainos, A. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00817-1 · Cited by 340
Rolls, E. T. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570035.001.0001 · Cited by 339
Self-citation
Cited by
The dynamic brain: from spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K., Robinson, P. A., Breakspear, M., & Friston, K. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000092 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationValue, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex
Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.004 · Cited by 766
Self-citationDecision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits
Wang, X.-J. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.034 · Cited by 679
“…showed that the intrinsically sto- 228 Neuron 60, October 23, 2008 ª2008 Elsevier Inc. chastic decision circuit dynamics could account for Weber’s law, which states that the ratio of just-noticeable input difference to absolute input intensity is constant (Deco and Rolls, 2006; Deco et al., 2007b).”
BackgroundThe mechanisms for pattern completion and pattern separation in the hippocampus
Rolls, E. T. (2013) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00074 · Cited by 545
Self-citationGenerative Models of Cortical Oscillations: Neurobiological Implications of the Kuramoto Model
Breakspear, M., Heitmann, S., & Daffertshofer, A. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00190 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- Deco, G., & Rolls, E. T.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 901-916
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2147336335
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision‐making and Weber's law: a neurophysiological model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04940.x
- The paper
- Deco, G., & Rolls, E. T. (2006). Decision‐making and Weber's law: a neurophysiological model. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04940.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.