Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 397

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non‐stereoselective reversal of neuropathic pain by naloxone and naltrexone: involvement of toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4)

Open access
Hutchinson, Mark R., Zhang, Yingning, Brown, Kimberley, Coats, Benjamen D., Shridhar, Mitesh, Sholar, Paige W., Patel, Sonica J., Crysdale, Nicole Y., Harrison, Jacqueline A., Maier, Steven F., Rice, Kenner C., Watkins, Linda R.·2008·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Although activated spinal cord glia contribute importantly to neuropathic pain, how nerve injury activates glia remains controversial. It has recently been proposed, on the basis of genetic approaches, that toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4) may be a key receptor for initiating microglial activation following L5 spinal nerve injury. The present studies extend this idea pharmacologically by showing that TLR4 is key for maintaining neuropathic pain following sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury (CCI). Established neuropathic pain was reversed by intrathecally delivered TLR4 receptor antagonists derived from lipopolysaccharide. Additionally, (+)‐naltrexone, (+)‐naloxone, and (−)‐naloxone, which we show here to be TLR4 antagonists in vitro on both stably transfected HEK293‐TLR4 and microglial cell lines, suppressed neuropathic pain with complete reversal upon chronic infusion. Immunohistochemical analyses of spinal cords following chronic infusion revealed suppression of CCI‐induced microglial activation by (+)‐naloxone and (−)‐naloxone, paralleling reversal of neuropathic pain. Together, these CCI data support the conclusion that neuron‐to‐glia signaling through TLR4 is important not only for initiating neuropathic pain, as suggested previously, but also for maintaining established neuropathic pain. Furthermore, these studies suggest that the novel TLR4 antagonists (+)‐naloxone and (−)‐naloxone can each fully reverse established neuropathic pain upon multi‐day administration. This finding with (+)‐naloxone is of potential clinical relevance. This is because (+)‐naloxone is an antagonist that is inactive at the (−)‐opioid selective receptors on neurons that produce analgesia. Thus, these data suggest that (+)‐opioid antagonists such as (+)‐naloxone may be useful clinically to suppress glial activation, yet (−)‐opioid agonists suppress pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06321.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 397

Metadata

Authors
Hutchinson, M. R., Zhang, Y., Brown, K., Coats, B. D., Shridhar, M., Sholar, P. W., Patel, S. J., Crysdale, N. Y., Harrison, J. A., Maier, S. F., Rice, K. C., & Watkins, L. R.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
20-29
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2108163830
Cited by
397
References
3
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐stereoselective reversal of neuropathic pain by naloxone and naltrexone: involvement of toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06321.x
The paper
Hutchinson, M. R., Zhang, Y., Brown, K., Coats, B. D., Shridhar, M., Sholar, P. W., Patel, S. J., Crysdale, N. Y., Harrison, J. A., Maier, S. F., Rice, K. C., & Watkins, L. R. (2008). Non‐stereoselective reversal of neuropathic pain by naloxone and naltrexone: involvement of toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4). European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06321.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.