Cited by 23Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid UseNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Tolerance to non‐opioid analgesics in PAG involves unresponsiveness of medullary pain‐modulating neurons in male rats

Tortorici, Victor, Aponte, Yexica, Acevedo, Humberto, Nogueira, Lourdes, Vanegas, Horacio·2009·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Opiate analgesia can be hampered by a reduction in pharmacological effectiveness (tolerance), and this crucially depends on the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG). Non-opioids like metamizol (dipyrone) or aspirin also induce PAG-dependent analgesia and tolerance, but the neuronal bases of this tolerance are unknown. Metamizol is a pyrazolon derivative and cyclooxygenase inhibitor with widespread use as an analgesic in Europe and Latin America. Metamizol was microinjected into the PAG of awake male rats, and antinociception was assessed by the tail flick (TF) and hot plate (HP) tests. Microinjection twice daily for 2.5 days caused tolerance to metamizol. The rats were then anesthetized and recordings from pain-facilitating on-cells and pain-inhibiting off-cells of the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) were performed. PAG microinjection of morphine or metamizol depresses on-cells, activates off-cells and thus inhibits nociception, including TF and HP. In metamizol-tolerant rats, however, PAG microinjection of metamizol failed to affect on- or off-cells, and this is interpreted as the reason for tolerance. In metamizol-tolerant rats morphine microinjection into PAG also failed to affect RVM neurons or nociception (cross-tolerance). In naïve, non-tolerant rats the antinociceptive effect of PAG-microinjected metamizol or morphine was blocked when CTOP, a mu-opioid antagonist, was previously microinjected into the same PAG site. These results emphasize a close relationship between o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06678.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the same time that cardiac sympathetic tone is increased, vagal cardiac parasympathetic tone is reduced.

    “At the same time that cardiac sympathetic tone is increased, vagal cardiac parasympathetic tone is reduced.”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [51]

  • The reduction in vagal cardiac parasympathetic tone is mediated primarily by efferent vagal fibers that originate from the nucleus ambiguous and fire in synchrony with the respiratory cycle.

    “According to current neurophysiological models,3,51 this process is mediated primarily by the efferent vagal fibers that originate from the nucleus ambiguous and that fire in synchrony with the respiratory cycle (respiratory-related cardiac vagal efferents) (see Supplemental Text Box 2, http://links.lww.com/HRP/A9).”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [51]

  • The integrated freeze response includes an opioid-mediated analgesia, which is itself mediated by the PAG and the rostral ventromedial medulla pain circuit.

    “The integrated freeze response includes an opioid-mediated analgesia,28,29 which is itself mediated by the PAG and the rostral ventromedial medulla pain circuit.71”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [71]

  • The antinociceptive response elicited during tonic immobility is opioid mediated and involves activation of the PAG and the rostral ventromedial medulla pain circuit.

    “The antinociceptive response elicited during tonic immobility is opioid mediated103,104 and involves activation of the PAG and the rostral ventromedial medulla pain circuit.71”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [71]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tortorici, V., Aponte, Y., Acevedo, H., Nogueira, L., & Vanegas, H.
Affiliations
Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (VE)
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1188-1196
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2158280608
Cited by
23
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
analgesic tolerance, periaqueductal gray, dipyrone, non-opioid analgesics, morphine, cross-tolerance, rostral ventromedial medulla, mu-opioid receptor, CTOP, opioid analgesia, antinociception
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Aspirin, Dipyrone, Drug Tolerance, Male, Medulla Oblongata, Morphine, Narcotics, Neurons, Pain, Pain Measurement, Periaqueductal Gray, Reaction Time, Somatostatin, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review