Cited by 73Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMotor Control and AdaptationWriting and Handwriting Education

The anterior superior parietal lobule and its interactions with language and motor areas during writing

Segal, Emily, Petrides, Michael·2012·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Past neuroimaging studies of writing demonstrate activation foci in several regions of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). The present study aimed to dissociate the role of the superior parietal lobule (SPL) from the other PPC regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and functional connectivity. First, parametric event‐related fMRI permitted the categorical comparison of experimental writing conditions with control conditions that were carefully chosen to match the experimental conditions in terms of variables extraneous to the motor act of writing, such as visual stimulus characteristics, and generating and retrieving verbal information. A selective focus of increased activation in the PPC restricted to the rostral part of the SPL (area PE) in the left hemisphere was demonstrated. Subsequently, functional connectivity analysis showed that area PE flexibly interacts with different language areas depending on the linguistic demands of the writing task. Activity in area PE correlates with the left angular gyrus, a region implicated in reading, when the writing is in response to words that are read; in sharp contrast, when the writing is in response to pictured objects, then area PE correlates with the supramarginal gyrus, a region involved in the articulatory and phonological loop, as well as with prefrontal regions that are involved in the retrieval and selection of semantic information. The results suggest that area PE serves as a critical interface between posterior cortical regions in the left hemisphere involved in language processing and the central motor and sensory regions that are directly involved in the control of movement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07937.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Segal and Petrides observed that typing activated a similar motor network regardless of the language used.

    “This contrasted with findings from Segal and Petrides [21], who studied nine bilingual English–French speakers and observed that typing activated a similar motor network regardless of the language used, suggesting a lower influence of linguistic specificity in typing compared with handwriting.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segal, E., & Petrides, M.
Affiliations
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Segal, Emily
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-20
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
309-322
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1512906525
Cited by
73
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN 37753)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
writing, posterior parietal cortex, angular gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, functional connectivity, language processing, motor control, semantic search, phonological loop, left hemisphere, event-related fMRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review