The anterior superior parietal lobule and its interactions with language and motor areas during writing
Abstract
Past neuroimaging studies of writing demonstrate activation foci in several regions of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). The present study aimed to dissociate the role of the superior parietal lobule (SPL) from the other PPC regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and functional connectivity. First, parametric event‐related fMRI permitted the categorical comparison of experimental writing conditions with control conditions that were carefully chosen to match the experimental conditions in terms of variables extraneous to the motor act of writing, such as visual stimulus characteristics, and generating and retrieving verbal information. A selective focus of increased activation in the PPC restricted to the rostral part of the SPL (area PE) in the left hemisphere was demonstrated. Subsequently, functional connectivity analysis showed that area PE flexibly interacts with different language areas depending on the linguistic demands of the writing task. Activity in area PE correlates with the left angular gyrus, a region implicated in reading, when the writing is in response to words that are read; in sharp contrast, when the writing is in response to pictured objects, then area PE correlates with the supramarginal gyrus, a region involved in the articulatory and phonological loop, as well as with prefrontal regions that are involved in the retrieval and selection of semantic information. The results suggest that area PE serves as a critical interface between posterior cortical regions in the left hemisphere involved in language processing and the central motor and sensory regions that are directly involved in the control of movement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Segal and Petrides observed that typing activated a similar motor network regardless of the language used.
“This contrasted with findings from Segal and Petrides [21], who studied nine bilingual English–French speakers and observed that typing activated a similar motor network regardless of the language used, suggesting a lower influence of linguistic specificity in typing compared with handwriting.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Working memory: Looking back and looking forward
Baddeley, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1201 · Cited by 5,200 · see citing works
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 8× · see citing works
“…to the motor aspects of writing is not surprising in light of electrophysiological recordings of the macaque demonstrating its role in the manipulation of objects in space (Sakata et al., 1973; Mountcastle et al., 1975; Taira et al., 1990; Lacquaniti et al., 1995; Georgopoulos et al., 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability
Caspers, S., Geyer, S., Schleicher, A., Mohlberg, H., Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.054 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Representing spatial information for limb movement: role of area 5 in the monkey
Lacquaniti, F., Guigon, E., Bianchi, L., Ferraina, S., & Caminiti, R. (1995) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/5.5.391 · Cited by 398 · cited 4× · see citing works
“logical recordings of the macaque demonstrating its role in the manipulation of objects in space (Sakata et al., 1973; Mountcastle et al., 1975; Taira et al., 1990; Lacquaniti et al., 1995; Georgopoulos et al., 2005).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Hale, T. S., Wiley, J. F., Smalley, S. L., Tung, K. L., Kaminsky, O., McGough, J. J., Jaini, A. M., & Loo, S. K. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00063 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Segal, E., & Petrides, M.
- Affiliations
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Segal, Emily
- ORCID
- Petrides, Michael
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-20
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-322
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W1512906525
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN 37753)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- writing, posterior parietal cortex, angular gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, functional connectivity, language processing, motor control, semantic search, phonological loop, left hemisphere, event-related fMRI
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review