The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutral theory and community ecology
Abstract
I review the mathematical and biological aspects of Hubbell's (2001) neutral theory of species abundance for ecological communities, and clarify its historical connections with closely related approaches in population genetics. A selective overview of the empirical evidence for and against this theory is provided, with a special emphasis on tropical plant communities. The neutral theory predicts many of the basic patterns of biodiversity, confirming its heuristic power. The strict assumption of equivalence that defines neutrality, equivalence among individuals, finds little empirical support in general. However, a weaker assumption holds for stable communities, the equivalence of average fitness among species. One reason for the surprising success of the neutral theory is that all the theories of species coexistence satisfying the fitness equivalence assumption, including many theories of niche differentiation, generate exactly the same patterns as the neutral theory. Hubbell's neutral theory represents an important synthesis and a much needed demonstration of the pivotal role of intraspecific variability in ecology. Further improvements should lead to an explicit linking to niche‐based processes. This research programme will depend crucially on forthcoming theoretical and empirical achievements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Lakatos, I. (1970) · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009 · Cited by 4,649 · cited 4×
“According to Lakatos (1970), ‘insistence on testing predictions too early [...] may result in premature rejection of a partially correct theory , hence theories should be ‘sheltered before they are ‘mature .”
BackgroundInfluentialLavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory
Hirzel, A. H., & Le Lay, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x · Cited by 873
NEUTRAL THEORY AND THE EVOLUTION OF ECOLOGICAL EQUIVALENCE
Hubbell, S. P. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1387:ntateo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 594
Microbial landscapes: new paths to biofilm research
Battin, T. J., Sloan, W. T., Kjelleberg, S., Daims, H., Head, I. M., Curtis, T. P., & Eberl, L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1556 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Chave, J.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-253
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2124380570
- Cited by
- 1,149
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutral theory and community ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2003.00566.x
- The paper
- Chave, J. (2004). Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2003.00566.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.