The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms
Open accessAbstract
Restoration ecology is a young academic field, but one with enough history to judge it against past and current expectations of the science's potential. The practice of ecological restoration has been identified as providing ideal experimental settings for tests of ecological theory; restoration was to be the ‘acid test’ of our ecological understanding. Over the past decade, restoration science has gained a strong academic foothold, addressing problems faced by restoration practitioners, bringing new focus to existing ecological theory and fostering a handful of novel ecological ideas. In particular, recent advances in plant community ecology have been strongly linked with issues in ecological restoration. Evolving models of succession, assembly and state‐transition are at the heart of both community ecology and ecological restoration. Recent research on seed and recruitment limitation, soil processes, and diversity–function relationships also share strong links to restoration. Further opportunities may lie ahead in the ecology of plant ontogeny, and on the effects of contingency, such as year effects and priority effects. Ecology may inform current restoration practice, but there is considerable room for greater integration between academic scientists and restoration practitioners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T., & Lehman, C. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060391 · Cited by 2,373
Experimental evidence for alternative stable equilibria in a benthic pond food web
Chase, J. M. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00482.x · Cited by 159
Seabloom, E. W., & Valk, A. G. (2003) · Wetlands · doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0001:pdcaio]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 135
Vole-driven succession in experimental wet-prairie restorations
Howe, H. F., & Lane, D. (2004) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/03-5182 · Cited by 43
Cited by
Effectiveness of ecological rescue for altered soil microbial communities and functions
Calderón, K., Spor, A., Breuil, M.-C., Bru, D., Bizouard, F., Violle, C., Barnard, R. L., & Philippot, L. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.86 · Cited by 205
Samara, J., Moossavi, S., Alshaikh, B., Ortega, V. A., Pettersen, V. K., Ferdous, T., Hoops, S. L., Soraisham, A., Vayalumkal, J., Dersch-Mills, D., et al. (2022) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.005 · Cited by 191
Modelling soil carbon and nitrogen cycles during land use change. A review
Batlle-Aguilar, J., Brovelli, A., Porporato, A., & Barry, D. A. (2011) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro/2010007 · Cited by 101
Gonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, T. P., Petersen, D. A., & Clary, J. J.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 662-673
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2159989337
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00764.x
- The paper
- Young, T. P., Petersen, D. A., & Clary, J. J. (2005). The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00764.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
