The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores
Abstract
The success of invasive plants has been attributed to their escape from natural enemies and subsequent evolutionary change in allocation from defence to growth and reproduction. In common garden experiments with Senecio jacobaea, a noxious invasive weed almost worldwide, the invasive populations from North America, Australia, and New Zealand did indeed allocate more resources to vegetative and reproductive biomass. However, invasive plants did not show a complete change in allocation from defence to growth and reproduction. Protection against generalist herbivores increased in invasive populations and pyrrolizidine alkaloids, their main anti‐herbivore compounds, did not decline in invasive populations but were higher overall compared with native populations. In contrast, invasive plants lost additional protection against specialist herbivores adapted to pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Hence, the absence of specialist herbivores in invasive populations resulted in the evolution of lower protection against specialists and increased growth and reproduction, but also allowed a shift towards higher protection against generalist herbivores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Mark Lonsdale, W., Evans, H., Clout, M., & Bazzaz, F. A. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:bicegc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,156
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants
Elton, C. S. (1958) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7214-9 · Cited by 4,285
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants.
Richards, P. W., & Elton, C. S. (1959) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2257385 · Cited by 3,905
Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis
Keane, R. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02499-0 · Cited by 3,662
Schuenemeyer, J. H., McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269238 · Cited by 2,667
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants
Elton, C. C. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5851-7 · Cited by 2,465
Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis
Blossey, B., & Notzold, R. (1995) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261425 · Cited by 1,906
Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn.
Cheek, P. J., McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1990) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2347392 · Cited by 1,512
Introduced species and their missing parasites
Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P., McKenzie, V. J., & Kuris, A. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01346 · Cited by 1,491
Cited by
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R., & Nilsson, C. (2009) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x · Cited by 1,154
What we still don't know about invasion genetics
Bock, D. G., Caseys, C., Cousens, R. D., Hahn, M. A., Heredia, S. M., Hübner, S., Turner, K. G., Whitney, K. D., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13032 · Cited by 441
Keller, S. R., & Taylor, D. R. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01188.x · Cited by 414
Feng, Y.-L., Lei, Y.-B., Wang, R.-F., Callaway, R. M., Valiente-Banuet, A., Inderjit, Li, Y.-P., & Zheng, Y.-L. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808434106 · Cited by 345
Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion
Blumenthal, D. M. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00934.x · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Joshi, J., & Vrieling, K.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 704-714
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2150407111
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00769.x
- The paper
- Joshi, J., & Vrieling, K. (2005). The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00769.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
