The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs
Open accessAbstract
The present study investigated the relative importance of leaf and root carbon input for soil invertebrates. Experimental plots were established at the Swiss Canopy Crane (SCC) site where the forest canopy was enriched with 13 C depleted CO 2 at a target CO 2 concentration of c. 540 p.p.m. We exchanged litter between labelled and unlabelled areas resulting in four treatments: (i) leaf litter and roots labelled, (ii) only leaf litter labelled, (iii) only roots labelled and (iv) unlabelled controls. In plots with only 13 C‐labelled roots most of the soil invertebrates studied were significantly depleted in 13 C, e.g. earthworms, chilopods, gastropods, diplurans, collembolans, mites and isopods, indicating that these taxa predominantly obtain their carbon from belowground input. In plots with only 13 C‐labelled leaf litter only three taxa, including, e.g. juvenile Glomeris spp. (Diplopoda), were significantly depleted in 13 C suggesting that the majority of soil invertebrates obtain its carbon from roots. This is in stark contrast to the view that decomposer food webs are based on litter input from aboveground.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Sokol, N. W., Kuebbing, S. E., Karlsen‐Ayala, E., & Bradford, M. A. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15361 · Cited by 631
Lorenz, K., Lal, R., Preston, C. M., & Nierop, K. G. J. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.013 · Cited by 425
From patterns to causal understanding: Structural equation modeling (SEM) in soil ecology
Eisenhauer, N., Bowker, M. A., Grace, J. B., & Powell, J. R. (2015) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2015.03.002 · Cited by 417
The physical structure of soil: Determinant and consequence of trophic interactions
Erktan, A., Or, D., & Scheu, S. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107876 · Cited by 389
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollierer, M. M., Langel, R., Körner, C., Maraun, M., & Scheu, S.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 729-736
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2103477746
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01064.x
- The paper
- Pollierer, M. M., Langel, R., Körner, C., Maraun, M., & Scheu, S. (2007). The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01064.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.