The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities
Abstract
Key advances are being made on the structures of predator–prey food webs and competitive communities that enhance their stability, but little attention has been given to such complexity–stability relationships for mutualistic communities. We show, by way of theoretical analyses with empirically informed parameters, that structural properties can alter the stability of mutualistic communities characterized by nonlinear functional responses among the interacting species. Specifically, community resilience is enhanced by increasing community size (species diversity) and the number of species interactions (connectivity), and through strong, symmetric interaction strengths of highly nested networks. As a result, mutualistic communities show largely positive complexity–stability relationships, in opposition to the standard paradox. Thus, contrary to the commonly‐held belief that mutualism’s positive feedback destabilizes food webs, our results suggest that interplay between the structure and function of ecological networks in general, and consideration of mutualistic interactions in particular, may be key to understanding complexity–stability relationships of biological communities as a whole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Paine, R. T. (1980) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4220 · Cited by 1,824
Body size in ecological networks
WOODWARD, G., EBENMAN, B., EMMERSON, M., MONTOYA, J., OLESEN, J., VALIDO, A., & WARREN, P. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,251
Biodiversity, Stability, and Productivity in Competitive Communities
Lehman, C. L., & Tilman, D. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303402 · Cited by 913
Consumer‐food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders
Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M., & Tollrian, R. (2004) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793103006286 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Climate warming enhances microbial network complexity and stability
Yuan, M. M., Guo, X., Wu, L., Zhang, Y., Xiao, N., Ning, D., Shi, Z., Zhou, X., Wu, L., Yang, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-00989-9 · Cited by 2,238
Stability criteria for complex ecosystems
Allesina, S., & Tang, S. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10832 · Cited by 1,232
Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory
Landi, P., Minoarivelo, H. O., Brännström, Å., Hui, C., & Dieckmann, U. (2018) · Population Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10144-018-0628-3 · Cited by 685
Specialization and Rarity Predict Nonrandom Loss of Interactions from Mutualist Networks
Aizen, M. A., Sabatino, M., & Tylianakis, J. M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215320 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Okuyama, T., & Holland, J. N.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 208-216
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2157274337
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01137.x
- The paper
- Okuyama, T., & Holland, J. N. (2008). Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01137.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.