The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer‐food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders
Abstract
The functional response of a consumer is the relationship between its consumption rate and the abundance of its food. A functional response is said to be of type I if consumption rate increases linearly with food abundance up to a threshold level at which it remains constant. According to conventional wisdom, such type I responses are more frequent among filter feeders than among other consumers. However, the validity of this claim has never been tested. We review 814 functional responses from 235 studies, thereby showing that type I responses are not only exceptionally frequent among filter feeders but that they have only been reported from these consumers. These findings can be understood by considering the conditions that a consumer must fulfil in order to show a type I response. First, the handling condition: the consumer must have a negligibly small handling time (i.e. the time needed for capturing and eating a food item), or it must be able to search for and to capture food while handling other food. Second, the satiation condition: unless its gut is completely filled and gut passage time is minimal, the consumer must search for food at a maximal rate with maximal effort. It thus has to spend much time on foraging (i.e. searching for food and handling it). Our functional response review suggests that only filter feeders sometimes meet both of these conditions. This suggestion is reasonable because filter feeders typically fulfil the handling condition and can meet the s…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The real Serengeti system likely lies somewhere between the extreme type 2 functional response and the type 1 functional response.
“The reality of the system likely lies somewhere between the extreme type 2 FR and the type 1 FR, consistent with empirical evidence that true type 1 responses are rare and that most consumer-resource interactions show some degree of saturation”
From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as Jeschke et al. 2004
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density
Holling, C. S. (1966) · Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada · doi:10.4039/entm9848fv · Cited by 1,349
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1071/AR9700755 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1972.tb00088.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2425316 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90006-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00377110 · DOI
- 10.1080/00288330.1968.9515230 · DOI
- 10.1163/156854289X00039 · DOI
- 10.4319/lo.1972.17.6.0805 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/icb/39.2.374 · DOI
- 10.2307/3772 · DOI
- 10.2307/3959 · DOI
- 10.4039/Ent91385-7 · DOI
- 10.4039/Ent91293-5 · DOI
- 10.4039/entm9745fv · DOI
- 10.1086/303269 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0095:PFRDBH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Jørgensen C. B., 1966, Biology of Suspension Feeding
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80108-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/icb/24.1.71 · DOI
- 10.1080/00785326.1997.10433388 · DOI
- Maddison D.(ed.) (2003).The tree of life http://tolweb.org/tree/phylogeny.html.
- 10.2307/4914 · DOI
- McGowan C., 1997, The Raptor and the Lamb: Predators and Prey in the Living World
- 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb02009.x · DOI
- Muck P., 1984, An experimental study on the importance of food conditions for the relative abundance of calanoid copepods and cladocerans. 1. Comparative feeding studies with Eudiaptomus gracilis and Daphnia longispina, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 66, 157
- 10.4319/lo.1975.20.2.0259 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60288-3 · DOI
- Nauwerck A., 1959, Zur Bestimmung der Filtrierrate limnischer Planktontiere, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 25, 83
- 10.3354/meps042033 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80637-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004420050714 · DOI
- 10.1007/s004420050848 · DOI
- 10.4319/lo.1982.27.5.0935 · DOI
- 10.1139/z61-080 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1995.tb01440.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1385-1101(00)00054-X · DOI
- 10.4319/lo.1990.35.1.0024 · DOI
- Schmink H. K., 1996, Crustacea. Spezielle Zoologie – Teil 1: Einzeller und Wirbellase Tiere, 501
- 10.1071/WR9950101 · DOI
- 10.1086/285372 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3800(80)90060-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.2.549 · DOI
- 10.2307/1578 · DOI
- 10.2307/2402479 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1973.tb01095.x · DOI
- Walz N., 1978, The energy balance of the freshwater mussel Dreissena polymorpha Pallas in laboratory experiments and in Lake Constance. I. Pattern of activity, feeding and assimilation efficiency, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 55, 83
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nutrient retention by predators undermines predator coexistence on one prey
Klauschies, T., & Gaedke, U. (2020) · Theoretical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s12080-019-00440-y · Cited by 16
A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects
Clarke, D., Hopcraft, J. G. C., & Haydon, D. T. (2026) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/aje.70115
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M., & Tollrian, R.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jeschke, Jonathan M.
- Tollrian, Ralph
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 337-349
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2104925990
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- filter feeding, handling time, satiation, foraging, food abundance, predator-prey interactions, gut transit time, foraging effort
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Feeding Behavior, Invertebrates, Species Specificity, Ecosystem, Food Chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review