Cited by 437Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsIsotope Analysis in EcologyMarine and fisheries research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer‐food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders

Abstract

The functional response of a consumer is the relationship between its consumption rate and the abundance of its food. A functional response is said to be of type I if consumption rate increases linearly with food abundance up to a threshold level at which it remains constant. According to conventional wisdom, such type I responses are more frequent among filter feeders than among other consumers. However, the validity of this claim has never been tested. We review 814 functional responses from 235 studies, thereby showing that type I responses are not only exceptionally frequent among filter feeders but that they have only been reported from these consumers. These findings can be understood by considering the conditions that a consumer must fulfil in order to show a type I response. First, the handling condition: the consumer must have a negligibly small handling time (i.e. the time needed for capturing and eating a food item), or it must be able to search for and to capture food while handling other food. Second, the satiation condition: unless its gut is completely filled and gut passage time is minimal, the consumer must search for food at a maximal rate with maximal effort. It thus has to spend much time on foraging (i.e. searching for food and handling it). Our functional response review suggests that only filter feeders sometimes meet both of these conditions. This suggestion is reasonable because filter feeders typically fulfil the handling condition and can meet the s…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1464793103006286

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The real Serengeti system likely lies somewhere between the extreme type 2 functional response and the type 1 functional response.

    “The reality of the system likely lies somewhere between the extreme type 2 FR and the type 1 FR, consistent with empirical evidence that true type 1 responses are rare and that most consumer-resource interactions show some degree of saturation”

    From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as Jeschke et al. 2004

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1071/AR9700755 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1972.tb00088.x · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2425316 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90006-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF00377110 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/00288330.1968.9515230 · DOI
  7. 10.1163/156854289X00039 · DOI
  8. 10.4319/lo.1972.17.6.0805 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/icb/39.2.374 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/3772 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/3959 · DOI
  13. 10.4039/Ent91385-7 · DOI
  14. 10.4039/Ent91293-5 · DOI
  15. 10.4039/entm9745fv · DOI
  16. 10.1086/303269 · DOI
  17. 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0095:PFRDBH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  18. Jørgensen C. B., 1966, Biology of Suspension Feeding
  19. 10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80108-3 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/icb/24.1.71 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/00785326.1997.10433388 · DOI
  22. Maddison D.(ed.) (2003).The tree of life http://tolweb.org/tree/phylogeny.html.
  23. 10.2307/4914 · DOI
  24. McGowan C., 1997, The Raptor and the Lamb: Predators and Prey in the Living World
  25. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb02009.x · DOI
  26. Muck P., 1984, An experimental study on the importance of food conditions for the relative abundance of calanoid copepods and cladocerans. 1. Comparative feeding studies with Eudiaptomus gracilis and Daphnia longispina, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 66, 157
  27. 10.4319/lo.1975.20.2.0259 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60288-3 · DOI
  29. Nauwerck A., 1959, Zur Bestimmung der Filtrierrate limnischer Planktontiere, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 25, 83
  30. 10.3354/meps042033 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80637-X · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/s004420050714 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s004420050848 · DOI
  34. 10.4319/lo.1982.27.5.0935 · DOI
  35. 10.1139/z61-080 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1995.tb01440.x · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S1385-1101(00)00054-X · DOI
  38. 10.4319/lo.1990.35.1.0024 · DOI
  39. Schmink H. K., 1996, Crustacea. Spezielle Zoologie – Teil 1: Einzeller und Wirbellase Tiere, 501
  40. 10.1071/WR9950101 · DOI
  41. 10.1086/285372 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0304-3800(80)90060-5 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.94.2.549 · DOI
  44. 10.2307/1578 · DOI
  45. 10.2307/2402479 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1973.tb01095.x · DOI
  47. Walz N., 1978, The energy balance of the freshwater mussel Dreissena polymorpha Pallas in laboratory experiments and in Lake Constance. I. Pattern of activity, feeding and assimilation efficiency, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 55, 83

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M., & Tollrian, R.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Jeschke, Jonathan M.
  • Tollrian, Ralph
Venue
Biological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
337-349
ISSN
  • 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-7931
  • 1469-185X
OpenAlex
W2104925990
Cited by
437
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
filter feeding, handling time, satiation, foraging, food abundance, predator-prey interactions, gut transit time, foraging effort
MeSH terms
Animals, Feeding Behavior, Invertebrates, Species Specificity, Ecosystem, Food Chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review