The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models
Abstract
Stable isotopes are a powerful tool for ecologists, often used to assess contributions of different sources to a mixture (e.g. prey to a consumer). Mixing models use stable isotope data to estimate the contribution of sources to a mixture. Uncertainty associated with mixing models is often substantial, but has not yet been fully incorporated in models. We developed a Bayesian‐mixing model that estimates probability distributions of source contributions to a mixture while explicitly accounting for uncertainty associated with multiple sources, fractionation and isotope signatures. This model also allows for optional incorporation of informative prior information in analyses. We demonstrate our model using a predator–prey case study. Accounting for uncertainty in mixing model inputs can change the variability, magnitude and rank order of estimates of prey (source) contributions to the predator (mixture). Isotope mixing models need to fully account for uncertainty in order to accurately estimate source contributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory
Polis, G. A. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285208 · Cited by 1,041 · cited 2×
“Movements of nutrients and matter through food webs and ecosystems are often difficult to quantify, being transient, variable and difficult to observe ( Polis 1991 ).”
Background
Cited by
Assessing the effects of large mobile predators on ecosystem connectivity
McCauley, D. J., Young, H. S., Dunbar, R. B., Estes, J. A., Semmens, B. X., & Micheli, F. (2012) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/11-1653.1 · Cited by 233
Self-citationSubalusky, A. L., Dutton, C. L., Rosi, E. J., & Post, D. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614778114 · Cited by 206
The trophodynamics of marine top predators: Current knowledge, recent advances and challenges
Young, J. W., Hunt, B. P. V., Cook, T. R., Llopiz, J. K., Hazen, E. L., Pethybridge, H. R., Ceccarelli, D., Lorrain, A., Olson, R. J., Allain, V., et al. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.05.015 · Cited by 195
Zhang, Y., Shi, P., Song, J., & Li, Q. (2018) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9010018 · Cited by 121
Coupling of canopy and understory food webs by ground-dwelling predators.
Pringle, R. M., & Fox‐Dobbs, K. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01252.x · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, J. W., & Semmens, B. X.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 470-480
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2105706314
- Cited by
- 1,325
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01163.x
- The paper
- Moore, J. W., & Semmens, B. X. (2008). Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01163.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.