Cited by 1,041Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory

Polis, Gary A.·1991·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Food webs in the real world are much more complex than food-web literature would have us believe. This is illustrated by the web of the sand community in the Coachella Valley desert. The biota include 174 species of vascular plants, 138 species of vertebrates, more than 55 species of arachnids, and an unknown (but great) number of microorganisms, insects (2,000-3,000 estimated species), acari, and nematodes. Trophic relations are presented in a series of nested subwebs and delineations of the community. Complexity arises from the large number of interactive species, the frequency of omnivory, age structure, looping, the lack of compartmentalization, and the complexity of the arthropod and soil faunas. Web features found in the Coachella also characterize other communities and should produce equivalently complex webs. If anything, diversity and complexity in most nondesert habitats are greater than those in deserts. Patterns from the Coachella web are compared with theoretical predictions and "empirical generalizations" derived from catalogs of published webs. The Coachella web differs greatly: chains are longer, omnivory and loops are not rare, connectivity is greater (species interact with many more predators and prey), top predators are rare or nonexistent, and prey-topredator ratios are greater than 1.0. The evidence argues that actual community food webs are extraordinarily more complex than those webs cataloged by theorists. I argue that most cataloged webs are oversimplified caricatures of actual communities. That cataloged webs depict so few species, absurdly low ratios of predators on prey and prey eaten by predators, so few links, so little omnivory, a veritable absence of looping, and such a high proportion of top predators argues strongly that they poorly represent real biological communities. Consequently, the practice of abstracting empirical regularities from such catalogs yields an inaccurate and artifactual view of trophic interactions within communities. Contrary to strong assertions by many theorists, patterns from food webs of real communities generally do not support predictions arising from dynamic and graphic models of food-web structure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/285208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most food webs have poor resolution of primary producers, with plants in terrestrial systems and phytoplankton in aquatic ones typically represented by a few highly aggregated nodes.

    “First, most food webs have poor resolution of primary producers; plants in terrestrial systems and phytoplankton in aquatic ones are typically represented by a few nodes that are highly aggregated taxonomically.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polis, G. A.
Corresponding author
Polis, Gary A.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1991-07
Volume
138
Issue
1
Pages
123-155
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W1999855446
Cited by
1,041
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 46
FWCI
20.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
food web theory, food web complexity, Coachella Valley, trophic interactions, omnivory, predator-prey ratio, top predators, arthropod communities, soil fauna

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review