Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Senescence rates are determined by ranking on the fast–slow life‐history continuum

Open access
Jones, Owen R., Gaillard, Jean‐Michel, Tuljapurkar, Shripad, Alho, Jussi S., Armitage, Kenneth B., Becker, Peter H., Bize, Pierre, Brommer, Jon, Charmantier, Anne, Charpentier, Marie, Clutton‐Brock, Tim, Dobson, F. Stephen, Festa‐Bianchet, Marco, Gustafsson, Lars, Jensen, Henrik, Jones, Carl G., Lillandt, Bo‐Göran, McCleery, Robin, Merilä, Juha, Neuhaus, Peter, Nicoll, Malcolm A. C., Norris, Ken, Oli, Madan K., Pemberton, Josephine, Pietiäinen, Hannu, Ringsby, Thor Harald, Roulin, Alexandre, Saether, Bernt‐Erik, Setchell, Joanna M., Sheldon, Ben C., Thompson, Paul M., Weimerskirch, Henri, Jean Wickings, E., Coulson, Tim·2008·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Comparative analyses of survival senescence by using life tables have identified generalizations including the observation that mammals senesce faster than similar‐sized birds. These generalizations have been challenged because of limitations of life‐table approaches and the growing appreciation that senescence is more than an increasing probability of death. Without using life tables, we examine senescence rates in annual individual fitness using 20 individual‐based data sets of terrestrial vertebrates with contrasting life histories and body size. We find that senescence is widespread in the wild and equally likely to occur in survival and reproduction. Additionally, mammals senesce faster than birds because they have a faster life history for a given body size. By allowing us to disentangle the effects of two major fitness components our methods allow an assessment of the robustness of the prevalent life‐table approach. Focusing on one aspect of life history – survival or recruitment – can provide reliable information on overall senescence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01187.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Jones, O. R., Gaillard, J., Tuljapurkar, S., Alho, J. S., Armitage, K. B., Becker, P. H., Bize, P., Brommer, J., Charmantier, A., Charpentier, M., Clutton‐Brock, T., Dobson, F. S., Festa‐Bianchet, M., Gustafsson, L., Jensen, H., Jones, C. G., Lillandt, B., McCleery, R., Merilä, J., Neuhaus, P., Nicoll, M. A. C., Norris, K., Oli, M. K., Pemberton, J., Pietiäinen, H., Ringsby, T. H., Roulin, A., Saether, B., Setchell, J. M., Sheldon, B. C., Thompson, P. M., Weimerskirch, H., Jean Wickings, E., & Coulson, T.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-28
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
664-673
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2161955428
Cited by
353
References
52
FWCI
19.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Senescence rates are determined by ranking on the fast–slow life‐history continuum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01187.x
The paper
Jones, O. R., Gaillard, J., Tuljapurkar, S., Alho, J. S., Armitage, K. B., Becker, P. H., Bize, P., Brommer, J., Charmantier, A., Charpentier, M., Clutton‐Brock, T., Dobson, F. S., Festa‐Bianchet, M., Gustafsson, L., Jensen, H., Jones, C. G., Lillandt, B., McCleery, R., Merilä, J., . . . Coulson, T. (2008). Senescence rates are determined by ranking on the fast–slow life‐history continuum. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01187.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.