Cited by 94

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The long lives of primates and the ‘invariant rate of ageing’ hypothesis

Colchero, Fernando, Aburto, José Manuel, Archie, Elizabeth A., Boesch, Christophe, Breuer, Thomas, Campos, Fernando A., Collins, Anthony, Conde, Dalia A., Cords, Marina, Crockford, Catherine, Thompson, Melissa Emery, Fedigan, Linda M., Fichtel, Claudia, Groenenberg, Milou, Hobaiter, Catherine, Kappeler, Peter M., Lawler, Richard R., Lewis, Rebecca J., Machanda, Zarin P., Manguette, Marie L., Muller, Martin N., Packer, Craig, Parnell, Richard J., Perry, Susan, Pusey, Anne E., Robbins, Martha M., Seyfarth, Robert M., Silk, Joan B., Staerk, Johanna, Stoinski, Tara S., Stokes, Emma J., Strier, Karen B., Strum, Shirley C., Tung, Jenny, Villavicencio, Francisco, Wittig, Roman M., Wrangham, Richard W., Zuberbühler, Klaus, Vaupel, James W., Alberts, Susan C.·2021·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Is it possible to slow the rate of ageing, or do biological constraints limit its plasticity? We test the ‘invariant rate of ageing’ hypothesis, which posits that the rate of ageing is relatively fixed within species, with a collection of 39 human and nonhuman primate datasets across seven genera. We first recapitulate, in nonhuman primates, the highly regular relationship between life expectancy and lifespan equality seen in humans. We next demonstrate that variation in the rate of ageing within genera is orders of magnitude smaller than variation in pre-adult and age-independent mortality. Finally, we demonstrate that changes in the rate of ageing, but not other mortality parameters, produce striking, species-atypical changes in mortality patterns. Our results support the invariant rate of ageing hypothesis, implying biological constraints on how much the human rate of ageing can be slowed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-23894-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Oeppen, J. & Vaupel, J. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science 296, 1029–1031 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zuo, W., Jiang, S., Guo, Z., Feldman, M. W. & Tuljapurkar, S. Advancing front of old-age human survival. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11209–11214 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Vaupel, J. W., Villavicencio, F. & Bergeron-Boucher, M.-P. Demographic perspectives on the rise of longevity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2019536118 (2021). · DOI
  4. Jones, O. R. et al. Senescence rates are determined by ranking on the fast-slow life-history continuum. Ecol. Lett. 11, 664–673 (2008). · DOI
  5. Ricklefs, R. E. Life-history connections to rates of aging in terrestrial vertebrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10314–10319 (2010). · DOI
  6. Finch, C. E., Pike, M. C. & Witten, M. Slow mortality rate accelerations during aging in some animals approximate that of humans. Science 249, 902–905 (1990). · DOI
  7. Vaupel, J. W. Biodemography of human ageing. Nature 464, 536–542 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Partridge, L. The new biology of ageing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365, 147–154 (2010). · DOI
  9. Ricklefs, R. E. Intrinsic aging-related mortality in birds. J. Avian Biol. 31, 103–111 (2000). · DOI
  10. Bronikowski, A. M. et al. The aging baboon: comparative demography in a non-human primate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9591–9595 (2002). · DOI
  11. Tidière, M. et al. Comparative analyses of longevity and senescence reveal variable survival benefits of living in zoos across mammals. Sci. Rep. 6, 36361 (2016). · DOI
  12. Colchero, F. et al. The emergence of longevous populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 201612191–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612191113 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Barthold Jones, J. A., Lenart, A. & Baudisch, A. Complexity of the relationship between life expectancy and overlap of lifespans. PLoS One 13, e0197985 (2018). · DOI
  14. Baudisch, A. The pace and shape of ageing. Methods Ecol. Evolut. 2, 375–382 (2011). · DOI
  15. Demetrius, L. Demographic parameters and natural selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 4645–4647 (1974). · DOI
  16. Keyfitz, N. & Caswell, H. Applied Mathematical Demography. Statistics for Biology and Health (Springer-Verlag, 2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b139042 · DOI
  17. Wrigley, E.A., Davies, R.S., Oeppen, J.E. & Schofield, R.S. English Population History from Family Reconstitution 1580–1837. (Cambridge University Press, 1997). · DOI
  18. John, A.M. The Plantation Slaves of Trinidad, 1783–1816. 1–17 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).
  19. Meslé, F. & Vallin, J. Mortality and Causes of Death in 20th-century Ukraine. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012). · DOI
  20. Siler, W. A competing-risk model for animal mortality. Ecology 60, 750–757 (1979). · DOI
  21. Stroustrup, N. et al. The temporal scaling of Caenorhabditis elegans ageing. Nature 530, 103–107 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  22. van Raalte, A. A., Sasson, I. & Martikainen, P. The case for monitoring life-span inequality. Science 362, 1002–1004 (2018). · DOI
  23. Pfister, C. A. Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: evolutionary predictions and ecological implications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 213–218 (1998). · DOI
  24. Saether, B.-E. & Bakke, Ø. Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81, 642–653 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gaillard, J.-M. & Yoccoz, N. G. Temporal variation in survival of mammals: a case of environmental canalization? Ecology 84, 3294–3306 (2003). · DOI
  26. Gaillard, J.-M. et al. in Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology (ed. Kilman, R. M.) 312–323 (2016). · DOI
  27. Conde, D. A. et al. Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9658–9664 (2019). · DOI
  28. Castelló-Climent, A. & Doménech, R. Human capital inequality, life expectancy and economic growth. Econ. J. 118, 653–677 (2008). · DOI
  29. Smits, J. & Monden, C. Length of life inequality around the globe. Soc. Sci. Med. 68, 1114–1123 (2009). · DOI
  30. Demetrius, L. Adaptive value, entropy and survivorship curves. Nature 275, 213–214 (1978). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Barthold, J.A., Packer, C., Loveridge, A.J., Macdonald, D.W. & Colchero, F. Dead or gone? Bayesian inference on mortality for the dispersing sex. Ecol. Evol. 6, 4910–4923 (2016). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Colchero, F., Aburto, J. M., Archie, E. A., Boesch, C., Breuer, T., Campos, F. A., Collins, A., Conde, D. A., Cords, M., Crockford, C., Thompson, M. E., Fedigan, L. M., Fichtel, C., Groenenberg, M., Hobaiter, C., Kappeler, P. M., Lawler, R. R., Lewis, R. J., Machanda, Z. P., Manguette, M. L., Muller, M. N., Packer, C., Parnell, R. J., Perry, S., Pusey, A. E., Robbins, M. M., Seyfarth, R. M., Silk, J. B., Staerk, J., Stoinski, T. S., Stokes, E. J., Strier, K. B., Strum, S. C., Tung, J., Villavicencio, F., Wittig, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., Zuberbühler, K., Vaupel, J. W., & Alberts, S. C.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-06-16
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
94
References
3
Language
en
Funders
Max Planck Institute of Demographic Research the Duke University Population Research Institute

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review