The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A general framework for the distance–decay of similarity in ecological communities
Open accessAbstract
Species spatial turnover, or β‐diversity, induces a decay of community similarity with geographic distance known as the distance–decay relationship. Although this relationship is central to biodiversity and biogeography, its theoretical underpinnings remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a general framework to describe how the distance–decay relationship is influenced by population aggregation and the landscape‐scale species‐abundance distribution. We utilize this general framework and data from three tropical forests to show that rare species have a weak influence on distance–decay curves, and that overall similarity and rates of decay are primarily influenced by species abundances and population aggregation respectively. We illustrate the utility of the framework by deriving an exact analytical expression of the distance–decay relationship when population aggregation is characterized by the Poisson Cluster Process. Our study provides a foundation for understanding the distance–decay relationship, and for predicting and testing patterns of beta‐diversity under competing theories in ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cressie, N. A. C. (1993) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119115151 · Cited by 6,507
Rings, circles and null models for point pattern analysis in ecology.
Wiegand, T., & A. Moloney, K. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12497.x · Cited by 1,157
Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation.
Scanlon, T. M., Caylor, K. K., Levin, S. A., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06060 · Cited by 404
Cited by
Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape
Hanson, C. A., Fuhrman, J. A., Horner-Devine, M. C., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2795 · Cited by 1,739
Jiao, S., Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (2020) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0522-9 · Cited by 1,052
The biomass and biodiversity of the continental subsurface
Magnabosco, C., Lin, L.-H., Dong, H., Bomberg, M., Ghiorse, W., Stan-Lotter, H., Pedersen, K., Kieft, T. L., van Heerden, E., & Onstott, T. C. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0221-6 · Cited by 473
Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges
Olden, J. D., Kennard, M. J., Leprieur, F., Tedesco, P. A., Winemiller, K. O., & García‐Berthou, E. (2010) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00655.x · Cited by 403
Amend, A. S., Seifert, K. A., Samson, R., & Bruns, T. D. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000454107 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Morlon, H., Chuyong, G., Condit, R., Hubbell, S., Kenfack, D., Thomas, D., Valencia, R., & Green, J. L.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 904-917
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2090596951
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A general framework for the distance–decay of similarity in ecological communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01202.x
- The paper
- Morlon, H., Chuyong, G., Condit, R., Hubbell, S., Kenfack, D., Thomas, D., Valencia, R., & Green, J. L. (2008). A general framework for the distance–decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01202.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.