The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany
Abstract
Cities are hotspots of plant species richness, harboring more species than their rural surroundings, at least over large enough scales. However, species richness does not necessarily cover all aspects of biodiversity such as phylogenetic relationships. Ignoring these relationships, our understanding of how species assemblages develop and change in a changing environment remains incomplete. Given the high vascular plant species richness of urbanized areas in Germany, we asked whether these also have a higher phylogenetic diversity than rural areas, and whether phylogenetic diversity patterns differ systematically between species groups characterized by specific functional traits. Calculating the average phylogenetic distinctness of the total German flora and accounting for spatial autocorrelation, we show that phylogenetic diversity of urban areas does not reflect their high species richness. Hence, high urban species richness is mainly due to more closely related species that are functionally similar and able to deal with urbanization. This diminished phylogenetic information might decrease the flora’s capacity to respond to environmental changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
F. Dormann, C., M. McPherson, J., B. Araújo, M., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., G. Davies, R., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Daniel Kissling, W., et al. (2007) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · Cited by 3,433
Self-citationDid insect pollination cause increased seed plant diversity?
GORELICK, R. (2001) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2001.tb01403.x · Cited by 65
Cited by
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
Homogenization of plant diversity, composition, and structure in North American urban yards
Pearse, W. D., Cavender‐Bares, J., Hobbie, S. E., Avolio, M. L., Bettez, N., Roy Chowdhury, R., Darling, L. E., Groffman, P. M., Grove, J. M., Hall, S. J., et al. (2018) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2105 · Cited by 130
Is there an urban effect in alien plant invasions?
Kühn, I., Wolf, J., & Schneider, A. (2017) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1591-1 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Knapp, S., Kühn, I., Schweiger, O., & Klotz, S.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1054-1064
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2001279293
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01217.x
- The paper
- Knapp, S., Kühn, I., Schweiger, O., & Klotz, S. (2008). Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01217.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.