Dual influences of ecosystem size and disturbance on food chain length in streams
Abstract
The number of trophic transfers occurring between basal resources and top predators, food chain length (FCL), varies widely in the world's ecosystems for reasons that are poorly understood, particularly for stream ecosystems. Available evidence indicates that FCL is set by energetic constraints, environmental stochasticity, or ecosystem size effects, although no single explanation has yet accounted for FCL patterns in a broad sense. Further, whether environmental disturbance can influence FCL has been debated on both theoretical and empirical grounds for quite some time. Using data from sixteen South Island, New Zealand streams, we determined whether the so-called ecosystem size, disturbance, or resource availability hypotheses could account for FCL variation in high country fluvial environments. Stable isotope-based estimates of maximum trophic position ranged from 2.6 to 4.2 and averaged 3.5, a value on par with the global FCL average for streams. Model-selection results indicated that stream size and disturbance regime best explained across-site patterns in FCL, although resource availability was negatively correlated with our measure of disturbance; FCL approached its maximum in large, stable springs and was <3.5 trophic levels in small, fishless and/or disturbed streams. Community data indicate that size influenced FCL, primarily through its influence on local fish species richness (i.e., via trophic level additions and/or insertions), whereas disturbance did so via an e…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The positive relationship between mussel and fish species richness and watershed area could be due to both greater habitat availability and more stable environments typically associated with larger streams.
“The positive relationship between mussel and fish species richness and watershed area could be due to both greater habitat availability and more stable environments typically associated with larger streams (McHugh et al., 2010).”
From Environmental gradients drive convergence in life history strategies among disparate but coevolved taxonomic groups (2025) · cites this paper as McHugh et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atkinson, C. L., Franzen, A. J., Hopper, G. W., Lopez, J. W., Zbinden, Z. D., & Vaughn, C. C. (2025) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.70273 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- McHugh, P. A., McIntosh, A. R., & Jellyman, P. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Canterbury (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- McHugh, Peter A.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 881-890
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2100972551
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Keywords
- food chain length, trophic levels, stream ecosystems, ecosystem size, environmental disturbance, resource availability, food web structure, fish species richness, predatory invertebrates, springs, trophic transfer, energetic constraints
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Fresh Water, New Zealand, Ecosystem, Food Chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review