The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review: Environmental noise and animals
Abstract
The scope and magnitude of anthropogenic noise pollution are often much greater than those of natural noise and are predicted to have an array of deleterious effects on wildlife. Recent work on this topic has focused mainly on behavioural responses of animals exposed to noise. Here, by outlining the effects of acoustic stimuli on animal physiology, development, neural function and genetic effects, we advocate the use of a more mechanistic approach in anthropogenic environments. Specifically, we summarise evidence and hypotheses from research on laboratory, domestic and free-living animals exposed to biotic and abiotic stimuli, studied both observationally and experimentally. We hope that this molecular- and cellular-focused literature, which examines the effects of noise on the neuroendocrine system, reproduction and development, metabolism, cardiovascular health, cognition and sleep, audition, the immune system, and DNA integrity and gene expression, will help researchers better understand results of previous work, as well as identify new avenues of future research in anthropogenic environments. Furthermore, given the interconnectedness of these physiological, cellular and genetic processes, and their effects on behaviour and fitness, we suggest that much can be learned from a more integrative framework of how and why animals are affected by environmental noise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A prospective study of diet quality and mental health in adolescents
Jacka, F. N., Kremer, P. J., Berk, M., de Silva-Sanigorski, A. M., Moodie, M., Leslie, E. R., Pasco, J. A., & Swinburn, B. A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024805 · Cited by 374
Cited by
Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity
Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kidd, K. A., MacCormack, T. J., Olden, J. D., Ormerod, S. J., et al. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12480 · Cited by 3,645
Ecoacoustics: the Ecological Investigation and Interpretation of Environmental Sound
Sueur, J., & Farina, A. (2015) · Biosemiotics · doi:10.1007/s12304-015-9248-x · Cited by 485
Li, S.-J., Luo, Y.-F., Liu, Z.-C., Xiong, L., & Zhu, B.-W. (2021) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/5547749 · Cited by 28
Acoustic stress induces long term severe intestinal inflammation in the mouse
Miranda, S., & Roux, M. E. (2017) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.07.898 · Cited by 16
Wilk, A. J., Donlon, K. C., & Peterman, W. E. (2020) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-020-00958-8 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kight, C. R., & Swaddle, J. P.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1052-1061
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108011617
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.