Cited by 1,736Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeClimate variability and models

Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises

Open access
Williams, John W., Jackson, Stephen T.·2007·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

No-analog communities (communities that are compositionally unlike any found today) occurred frequently in the past and will develop in the greenhouse world of the future. The well documented no-analog plant communities of late-glacial North America are closely linked to “novel” climates also lacking modern analogs, characterized by high seasonality of temperature. In climate simulations for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change A2 and B1 emission scenarios, novel climates arise by 2100 AD, primarily in tropical and subtropical regions. These future novel climates are warmer than any present climates globally, with spatially variable shifts in precipitation, and increase the risk of species reshuffling into future no-analog communities and other ecological surprises. Most ecological models are at least partially parameterized from modern observations and so may fail to accurately predict ecological responses to these novel climates. There is an urgent need to test the robustness of ecological models to climate conditions outside modern experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/070037

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate change and human-pressures are already pushing ecological systems into novel states.

    “This is particularly the case since climate change and human-pressures are already pushing ecological systems into novel states (Williams and Jackson, 2007; Williams et al., 2021).”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Williams and Jackson, 2007

    The section “Individualistic species shifts and no-analog communities: a conceptual framework” reports species responding to current climate change. But “Implications for ecological forecasting” says human pressures will interact with novel climates, while the paper describes novel communities chiefly as a future risk; it does not establish that those pressures are already pushing ecological systems into novel states. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Betancourt JL, Van Devender TR, and Martin PS (Eds). 1990. Packrat middens: the last 40 000 years of biotic change. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
  2. Davis MB. 1981. Quaternary history and the stability of forest com- munities. In: West DC, Shugart HH, and Botkin DB (Eds). Forest succession. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  3. Grimm EC and Jacobson Jr GL. 2004. Late-Quaternary vegetation history of the eastern United States. In: Gillespie AR, Porter SC, and Atwater BR (Eds). The Quaternary period in the United States. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  4. Overpeck JT, Whitlock C, and Huntley B. 2003. Terrestrial bios- phere dynamics in the climate system: past and future. In: Bradley RS, Pedersen TF, Alverson KD, and Bergmann KF (Eds). Paleoclimate, global change and the future. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  5. Webb III T, Shuman BN, and Williams JW. 2004. Climatically forced vegetation dynamics in North America during the late Quaternary period. In: Gillespie AR, Porter SC, and Atwater BF (Eds). The Quaternary period in the United States. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. W., & Jackson, S. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, John W.
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
475-482
ISSN
1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992239134
Cited by
1,736
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 124 · 2012: 109
FWCI
37.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0345012, 0613952, 0507999, 0716471)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
novel climates, climate change, floristic composition, climate model parameterization, precipitation change, emission scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review