Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anaerobic redox cycling of iron by freshwater sediment microorganisms

Weber, Karrie A., Urrutia, Matilde M., Churchill, Perry F., Kukkadapu, Ravi K., Roden, Eric E.·2006·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: The potential for microbially mediated anaerobic redox cycling of iron (Fe) was examined in a first‐generation enrichment culture of freshwater wetland sediment microorganisms. Most probable number enumerations revealed the presence of significant populations of Fe(III)‐reducing (approximately 10 8 cells ml −1 ) and Fe(II)‐oxidizing, nitrate‐reducing organisms (approximately 10 5 cells ml −1 ) in the freshwater sediment used to inoculate the enrichment cultures. Nitrate reduction commenced immediately following inoculation of acetate‐containing (approximately 1 mM) medium with a small quantity (1% v/v) of wetland sediment, and resulted in the transient accumulation of NO 2 − and production of a mixture of gaseous end‐products (N 2 O and N 2 ) and NH 4 + . Fe(III) oxide (high surface area goethite) reduction took place after NO 3 − was depleted and continued until all the acetate was utilized. Addition of NO 3 − after Fe(III) reduction ceased resulted in the immediate oxidation of Fe(II) coupled to reduction of NO 3 − to NH 4 + . No significant NO 2 − accumulation was observed during nitrate‐dependent Fe(II) oxidation. No Fe(II) oxidation occurred in pasteurized controls. Microbial community structure in the enrichment was monitored by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction‐amplified 16S rDNA and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction‐amplified 16S rRNA, as well as by construction of 16S rDNA clone libraries for four different time points during the experiment. Strong similarities in dominant members of the microbial community were observed in the Fe(III) reduction and nitrate‐dependent Fe(II) oxidation phases of the experiment, specifically the common presence of organisms closely related (≥ 95% sequence similarity) to the genera Geobacter and Dechloromonas . These results indicate that the wetland sediments contained organisms such as Geobacter sp. which are capable of both dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction and oxidation of Fe(II) with reduction of NO 3 − to NH 4 + . Our findings suggest that microbially catalysed nitrate‐dependent Fe(II) oxidation has the potential to contribute to a dynamic anaerobic Fe redox cycle in freshwater sediments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00873.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Weber, K. A., Urrutia, M. M., Churchill, P. F., Kukkadapu, R. K., & Roden, E. E.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-10
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
100-113
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2016419859
Cited by
328
References
4
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaerobic redox cycling of iron by freshwater sediment microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00873.x
The paper
Weber, K. A., Urrutia, M. M., Churchill, P. F., Kukkadapu, R. K., & Roden, E. E. (2006). Anaerobic redox cycling of iron by freshwater sediment microorganisms. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00873.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.