The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater lagoons at cattle feedlots with different antibiotic use strategies
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes tet (O) , tet (Q) , tet (W) , tet (M), tet (B) and tet (L), were quantified over time in wastewater lagoons at concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) to assess how feedlot operation affects resistance genes in downstream surface waters. Eight lagoons at five cattle feedlots in the Midwestern United States were monitored for 6 months. Resistance and 16S‐rRNA gene abundances were quantified using real‐time PCR, and physicochemical lagoon conditions, tetracycline levels, and other factors (e.g. feedlot size and weather conditions) were monitored over time. Lagoons were sorted according to antibiotic use practice at each site, and designated as ‘no‐use’, ‘mixed‐use’ or ‘high‐use’ for comparison. High‐use lagoons had significantly higher detected resistance gene levels (tet R ; 2.8 × 10 6 copies ml −1 ) relative to no‐use lagoons (5.1 × 10 3 copies ml −1 ; P < 0.01) and mixed‐use lagoons (7.3 × 10 5 copies ml −1 ; P = 0.076). Bivariate correlation analysis on pooled data ( n = 54) confirmed that tet R level strongly correlated with feedlot area ( r = 0.67, P < 0.01) and ‘total’ bacterial 16S‐rRNA gene level in each lagoon ( r = 0.51, P < 0.01), which are both characteristic of large CAFOs. tet (M) was the most commonly detected gene, both in absolute number and normalized to 16S‐rRNA gene level, although tet (O), tet (Q) and tet (W) levels were also high in the mixed and high‐use lagoons. Finally, resistance gene levels were highly seasonal with abundances being 10–100 times greater in the autumn versus the summer. Results show that antibiotic use strategy strongly affects both the abundance and seasonal distribution of resistance genes in associated lagoons, which has implications on water quality and feedlot management practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields
Heuer, H., Schmitt, H., & Smalla, K. (2011) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.009 · Cited by 985
Evidence of Increasing Antibiotic Resistance Gene Abundances in Archived Soils since 1940
Knapp, C. W., Dolfing, J., Ehlert, P. A. I., & Graham, D. W. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901221x · Cited by 837
Self-citationThe Scourge of Antibiotic Resistance: The Important Role of the Environment
Finley, R. L., Collignon, P., Larsson, D. G. J., McEwen, S. A., Li, X.-Z., Gaze, W. H., Reid-Smith, R., Timinouni, M., Graham, D. W., & Topp, E. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit355 · Cited by 636
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peak, N., Knapp, C. W., Yang, R. K., Hanfelt, M. M., Smith, M. S., Aga, D. S., & Graham, D. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08-29
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-151
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2156199116
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater lagoons at cattle feedlots with different antibiotic use strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01123.x
- The paper
- Peak, N., Knapp, C. W., Yang, R. K., Hanfelt, M. M., Smith, M. S., Aga, D. S., & Graham, D. W. (2007). Abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater lagoons at cattle feedlots with different antibiotic use strategies. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01123.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.