The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping field‐scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community
Abstract
Summary: There is ample evidence that microbial processes can exhibit large variations in activity on a field scale. However, very little is known about the spatial distribution of the microbial communities mediating these processes. Here we used geostatistical modelling to explore spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifying community, a functional guild involved in N‐cycling, in a grassland field subjected to different cattle grazing regimes. We observed a non‐random distribution pattern of the size of the denitrifier community estimated by quantification of the denitrification genes copy numbers with a macro‐scale spatial dependence (6–16 m) and mapped the distribution of this functional guild in the field. The spatial patterns of soil properties, which were strongly affected by presence of cattle, imposed significant control on potential denitrification activity, potential N 2 O production and relative abundance of some denitrification genes but not on the size of the denitrifier community. Absolute abundance of most denitrification genes was not correlated with the distribution patterns of potential denitrification activity or potential N 2 O production. However, the relative abundance of bacteria possessing the nosZ gene encoding the N 2 O reductase in the total bacterial community was a strong predictor of the N 2 O/(N 2 + N 2 O) ratio, which provides evidence for a relationship between bacterial community composition based on the relative abundance of denitrifiers in the total bacterial community and ecosystem processes. More generally, the presented geostatistical approach allows integrated mapping of microbial communities, and hence can facilitate our understanding of relationships between the ecology of microbial communities and microbial processes along environmental gradients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,052
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits
MCGILL, B., ENQUIST, B., WEIHER, E., & WESTOBY, M. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002 · Cited by 4,631
Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification.
Zumft, W. G. (1997) · Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · doi:10.1128/.61.4.533-616.1997 · Cited by 3,471
Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map
Martiny, J. B. H., Bohannan, B. J. M., Brown, J. H., Colwell, R. K., Fuhrman, J. A., Green, J. L., Horner-Devine, M. C., Kane, M., Krumins, J. A., Kuske, C. R., et al. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1341 · Cited by 3,022
A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand
Krige, D. G. (1951) · Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy · Cited by 2,409
Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming
Lashof, D. A., & Ahuja, D. R. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/344529a0 · Cited by 1,591
Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria: A Model for Molecular Microbial Ecology
Kowalchuk, G. A., & Stephen, J. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.485 · Cited by 1,351
Henry, S., Bru, D., Stres, B., Hallet, S., & Philippot, L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00231-06 · Cited by 984
Self-citationŠImek, M., & Cooper, J. E. (2002) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00461.x · Cited by 786
Self-citation
Cited by
Hu, H.-W., Chen, D., & He, J.-Z. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv021 · Cited by 800
Jones, C. M., Graf, D. R. H., Bru, D., Philippot, L., & Hallin, S. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.125 · Cited by 707
Self-citationThe ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks
Philippot, L., Andersson, S. G. E., Battin, T. J., Prosser, J. I., Schimel, J. P., Whitman, W. B., & Hallin, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2367 · Cited by 675
Self-citationGenomics and Ecology of Novel N2O-Reducing Microorganisms
Hallin, S., Philippot, L., Löffler, F. E., Sanford, R. A., & Jones, C. M. (2018) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.003 · Cited by 630
Self-citationGraf, D. R. H., Jones, C. M., & Hallin, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114118 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Philippot, L., Čuhel, J., Saby, N. P. A., Chèneby, D., Chroňáková, A., Bru, D., Arrouays, D., Martin‐Laurent, F., & Šimek, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-31
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1518-1526
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2061556632
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 38.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping field‐scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x
- The paper
- Philippot, L., Čuhel, J., Saby, N. P. A., Chèneby, D., Chroňáková, A., Bru, D., Arrouays, D., Martin‐Laurent, F., & Šimek, M. (2009). Mapping field‐scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.