Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping field‐scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community

Philippot, Laurent, Čuhel, Jiri, Saby, Nicolas P.A., Chèneby, Dominique, Chroňáková, Alicia, Bru, David, Arrouays, Dominique, Martin‐Laurent, Fabrice, Šimek, Miloslav·2009·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: There is ample evidence that microbial processes can exhibit large variations in activity on a field scale. However, very little is known about the spatial distribution of the microbial communities mediating these processes. Here we used geostatistical modelling to explore spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifying community, a functional guild involved in N‐cycling, in a grassland field subjected to different cattle grazing regimes. We observed a non‐random distribution pattern of the size of the denitrifier community estimated by quantification of the denitrification genes copy numbers with a macro‐scale spatial dependence (6–16 m) and mapped the distribution of this functional guild in the field. The spatial patterns of soil properties, which were strongly affected by presence of cattle, imposed significant control on potential denitrification activity, potential N 2 O production and relative abundance of some denitrification genes but not on the size of the denitrifier community. Absolute abundance of most denitrification genes was not correlated with the distribution patterns of potential denitrification activity or potential N 2 O production. However, the relative abundance of bacteria possessing the nosZ gene encoding the N 2 O reductase in the total bacterial community was a strong predictor of the N 2 O/(N 2 + N 2 O) ratio, which provides evidence for a relationship between bacterial community composition based on the relative abundance of denitrifiers in the total bacterial community and ecosystem processes. More generally, the presented geostatistical approach allows integrated mapping of microbial communities, and hence can facilitate our understanding of relationships between the ecology of microbial communities and microbial processes along environmental gradients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Philippot, L., Čuhel, J., Saby, N. P. A., Chèneby, D., Chroňáková, A., Bru, D., Arrouays, D., Martin‐Laurent, F., & Šimek, M.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-31
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1518-1526
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2061556632
Cited by
313
References
34
FWCI
38.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping field‐scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x
The paper
Philippot, L., Čuhel, J., Saby, N. P. A., Chèneby, D., Chroňáková, A., Bru, D., Arrouays, D., Martin‐Laurent, F., & Šimek, M. (2009). Mapping field‐scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.