Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 570

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees ( Apis mellifera )

Open access
Alaux, Cédric, Brunet, Jean‐Luc, Dussaubat, Claudia, Mondet, Fanny, Tchamitchan, Sylvie, Cousin, Marianne, Brillard, Julien, Baldy, Aurelie, Belzunces, Luc P., Le Conte, Yves·2010·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Global pollinators, like honeybees, are declining in abundance and diversity, which can adversely affect natural ecosystems and agriculture. Therefore, we tested the current hypotheses describing honeybee losses as a multifactorial syndrome, by investigating integrative effects of an infectious organism and an insecticide on honeybee health. We demonstrated that the interaction between the microsporidia Nosema and a neonicotinoid (imidacloprid) significantly weakened honeybees. In the short term, the combination of both agents caused the highest individual mortality rates and energetic stress. By quantifying the strength of immunity at both the individual and social levels, we showed that neither the haemocyte number nor the phenoloxidase activity of individuals was affected by the different treatments. However, the activity of glucose oxidase, enabling bees to sterilize colony and brood food, was significantly decreased only by the combination of both factors compared with control, Nosema or imidacloprid groups, suggesting a synergistic interaction and in the long term a higher susceptibility of the colony to pathogens. This provides the first evidences that interaction between an infectious organism and a chemical can also threaten pollinators, interactions that are widely used to eliminate insect pests in integrative pest management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02123.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Decline and conservation of bumble bees

    Goulson, D., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454 · Cited by 1,183 · cited 2×

    “Therefore, multifactorial analysis should be performed in other pollinator’ species such as bumblebees, which show similar sensitivity to pesticides as honeybees (Goulson et al., 2008), also are parasitized by N.”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 570

Metadata

Authors
Alaux, C., Brunet, J., Dussaubat, C., Mondet, F., Tchamitchan, S., Cousin, M., Brillard, J., Baldy, A., Belzunces, L. P., & Le Conte, Y.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-25
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
774-782
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2164008575
Cited by
570
References
1
FWCI
26.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees ( Apis mellifera ). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02123.x
The paper
Alaux, C., Brunet, J., Dussaubat, C., Mondet, F., Tchamitchan, S., Cousin, M., Brillard, J., Baldy, A., Belzunces, L. P., & Le Conte, Y. (2010). Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees ( Apis mellifera ). Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02123.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.